The Baha'i Studies Listserv There is no authoritative statement about this. My GUESS is that all homo were capable of receiving a Prophet. Also Autstrolophitecus afarensis because they were not mere animals.
Hasan ________________________________ De: Stephen Kent Gray <skg_z...@yahoo.com> Para: Baha'i Studies <bahai-st@list.jccc.edu> Enviado: Miércoles, 20 de febrero, 2013 4:32 P.M. Asunto: Humans (Homo genus, Homo sapiens sapiens and other subspecies) The Baha'i Studies Listserv http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaic_humans http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_antecessor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_heidelbergensis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_rhodesiensis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatomically_modern_humans http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_sapiens_idaltu http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human Homo sapiens sapiens (Humans as we know them today) Other subspecies Homo sapiens idaltu Homo sapiens antecessor Homo sapiens heidelbergensis Homo sapiens neanderthalensis Homo sapiens rhodesiensis So should subspecies or species nomeclature be used? Why? Sent from my iPad __________________________________________________ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:arch...@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:leave-689387-27401.54f46e81b66496c9909bcdc2f7987...@list.jccc.edu Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to ly...@list.jccc.edu Or subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News (on-campus only) - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu