THanks for the informative detail. I do know that Hess is the drilling
as of Sept 17 where I have mineral interests. I am truly grateful to
read as much in this blog as possible. It is a delightful task to read
daily.

On Oct 5, 4:13 am, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hang in there. The royalty checks you will receive will be very nice.
>
> Seriously, the players in ND don ot include a couple of Giants but
> they do include companies such as
>
> Marathon
> Hess
> Continental
> Whiting
> EOG
>
> Many of these listed are major as in S&P 500 sized companies, even if
> they have not yet made the Dow 30. They have both the sincere interest
> in the area and are big enough to be able to get the capital needed to
> develop the field.
>
> Here are the market caps and index memberships
>
> MRO  25.1 B S&P 500
> HES  23 B S&P 500
> CLR 4.93 B  no index
> WLL 2.38 B  no index
> EOG  20 B  S&P 500
>
> All of these companies have current market caps only about 60% from
> where they were at their peak a few months ago, perhaps less.
>
> In contrast, Exxon Mobil (XOM) has a market cap of 400 billion and Dow
> 30/S&P 500 membership
>
> An S&P 500 sized company has the capital needed to do the drilling
> properly and develop the field properly. The smaller companies can
> surely do a good job too, tho they might not have as many rigs
> drilling at once. Of course,a company like Whiting devotes a major
> share of its financial resources to th Bakken. The share of the total
> is substantial for a company like EOG but less as a percent of total
> company assets than for a Whiting or Continental.
>
> David
>
> On Oct 5, 12:20 am, niteman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Back in the mid 90's when they were drilling in the Lodgepole around
> > my area (Dickinson) I was getting the same letters and offers, Not $3
> > K per acre however.
> > tay tunSo these are not new just for the bakken.
>
> > On Oct 4, 6:22 pm, Lostwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Yesterday, in the mail, I rec'd a letter of offer from 'Permian Basin
> > > Acquisition Fund' for $3 K p/mineral acre. Having been in touch with
> > > others who stand to bear from mineral acre ownership, I understand
> > > this is like to quote "Deal or No Deal" ND style.(quote plagerized
> > > from a brother) In other posts, I have noted, the questions asked
> > > "Where are the huge oil companies? Why aren't they making bids in the
> > > Bakken?” For the record, would the larger oil companies put up a fund
> > > like this, for $2,000,000.00, as this letter says, to get their finger
> > > in the mix? And, with great respect for individuals who are 'native'
> > > to ND, do these snake oil salesmen or carpetbaggers really expect you
> > > are so provincial? It reminds me of emailed Nigerian scams. I also
> > > understand that there is a great deal of disquiet among those who have
> > > no mineral acres and those who do. That there is action stonewalling
> > > the building of a pipeline to get this oil to refineries. That there
> > > is a cap on oil being pumped only because there is a limit on how much
> > > oil can be moved without a pipeline. I also understand that the oil
> > > production in the Bakken is now over that of Oklahoma.
> > > Are there other offers for mineral acres to expect, I have had two,
> > > coming? The oil reserves there, per the USGS report in April have
> > > inspired many to action. Not all of them legitimate. Most of them
> > > greedy.
> > > Obviously the oil forecasters know what the rest of the world knows or
> > > they wouldn't want these mineral acres so badly.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Bakken Shale Discussion" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bakken-shale-discussion?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to