Larry,
Do your figures include the ThreeForks?


On Oct 19, 1:37 pm, Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While $20 oil price in Mountrail County sounds very low to be the
> breakeven price, it does compute for the EOG wells in Parshall Field
> and many of the Whiting wells in Sanish Field.  But it does not apply
> to other areas of Mountrail County.
>
> Deduct 25% from the $20 oil price for royalties and taxes, divide that
> number ($17.50)into $5 million and it requires 285,714 barrels of oil
> production from a well.
>
> Most of the EOG wells in Austin, Wayzetta, and Parshall Townships will
> easily produce 300,000 barrels in the first three years of production.
>
> On the other hand most of the wells outside of the Parshall/Sanish
> Field core areas in Mountrail County will never produce 300,000
> barrels in their lifetime.
>
> On Oct 19, 11:42 am, dkwilk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Maybe as a resident of the area you should put a nickel into you local
> > state representative, to introduce this type of legislation. There is
> > a lot more then on single part on the matter. Look at all the tax
> > collected from , Lease, income tax for employment, to hotel,motel tax
> > to on and on and on..the area of divide,mountrail, williams, burke,
> > dunn, Bowman counties have not seen this type of growth and income
> > since the 80's.  JMHO.. don
>
> > On Oct 19, 8:07 am, jajones422000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > what does everyone think about the threeforks prospects in se divide
> > > and ne williams co ? have not the yields been good enogh to continue
> > > drilling those ? perhaps the state needs to renew less taxes on the
> > > first 50,000 bbls to forestall another bust. there still is only a
> > > small amount of over supply in the world ,so a modest cutback by a big
> > > producer or a major disruption somewhere and oil would shoot upwards.
> > > On Oct 19, 7:40 am, dkwilk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > This artiicle appeared in todays Bismarck tribune. don
>
> > > > Oct 19, 2008 - 04:05:15 CDT
> > > > By BRIAN DUGGAN and LAUREN DONOVAN
> > > > Bismarck Tribune
> > > > A dramatic decline in the price of oil is good news for consumers, but
> > > > it will likely chill the hot action across some areas in North
> > > > Dakota's Bakken oil formation.
>
> > > > With an estimated recoverable reserve of 4.3 billion barrels, the
> > > > Bakken and associated oil layers have attracted dozens of drillers and
> > > > 85 rigs into the state, the most since the last oil boom in the early
> > > > '80s.
>
> > > > Strong prices for oil, including this summer's all-time high of more
> > > > than $160 a barrel, helped lubricate a play in which one well alone
> > > > costs as much as $5 million.
>
> > > > With oil now touching in at $70 a barrel, it's likely some producers
> > > > will pull away from areas where they had been looking to expand.
>
> > > > Lynn Helms, director of the state's Department of Natural Resources,
> > > > said he doesn't expect changes in the main core of the Bakken - Dunn,
> > > > McKenzie and Mountrail counties - but acknowledges the perimeter of
> > > > the Bakken play could be affected.
>
> > > > "This oil price is going to dampen expansion of the play but it's not
> > > > going to lead to collapse of the Bakken play or the play going away,"
> > > > Helms said. "The main areas are very solid."
>
> > > > Helms said the expansion areas are in trouble. However, he said there
> > > > is no single oil price floor that applies statewide.
>
> > > > The old rule of thumb of $65 to $75 a barrel to support the Bakken is
> > > > less true with drilling technology that increases well output from an
> > > > average of 250 barrels two years ago to 650 barrels a day today in
> > > > some places.
>
> > > > "Mountrail is performing so well with the new technology that break-
> > > > even prices for those kinds of wells is down around $20 a barrel,"
> > > > Helms said. Those wells used to break even around $60.
>
> > > > "Mountrail is the exception to the rule," Helms said.
>
> > > > For Dunn and East McKenzie counties, where 32 rigs are in operation,
> > > > the break-even price is about $40 a barrel.
>
> > > > Trouble spots are in Burke County at an $80 break-even range and
> > > > Divide at $55, along with Ward and McLean counties, he said.
>
> > > > "The core areas where we've got 60 rigs running are very solid even at
> > > > these oil prices. But for the outlaying areas - Divide, Burke and
> > > > Williams - it's a very different picture," Helms said.
>
> > > > Oil companies are reticent to talk about their positions, especially
> > > > publicly traded companies that are vulnerable to rapid dynamics in the
> > > > stock market.
>
> > > > Two of those - Marathon Oil and Continental Resources, both actively
> > > > drilling the Bakken in Dunn and McKenzie counties - are scheduled for
> > > > quarterly conference calls with stockholders and market analysts and
> > > > may comment on market conditions and drilling plans then.
>
> > > > Continental's spokesman said the company will talk after its Nov. 6
> > > > conference call, and Marathon's spokeswoman said her company hasn't
> > > > announced any change in its Bakken plans, and projections will be
> > > > included in its January budget.
>
> > > > Rick Ross, vice president of operations for Whiting Oil, which is
> > > > drilling in the Mountrail County portion of the Bakken, said his
> > > > company has drilled "very prolific" wells there "and we can stand a
> > > > lower price than in other places."
>
> > > > Ross said each company has its own tolerance in the market.
>
> > > > "It's not that we all fall off the table at once," he said. "There's a
> > > > huge range."
>
> > > > He said his company has not made a decision to slow down. "I don't see
> > > > it changing for us," Ross said.
>
> > > > Whiting has 22 completed wells and eight in various stages of drilling
> > > > and completion. Half of its 190,000 leased acres are in the Sanish and
> > > > Parshall fields on the Bakken.
>
> > > > Ron Ness, head of the North Dakota Petroleum Council, said that while
> > > > price tolerance varies from one oil company to the next, he is hearing
> > > > concern, not only from drillers, but secondary businesses that support
> > > > the industry.
>
> > > > "I have heard a lot of nervousness," Ness said. "The threshold for
> > > > each company will be different."
>
> > > > The canary in the oil "coal mine," is generally leasing activity, he
> > > > said. When mineral acreage leasing falls quiet, it's a sign
> > > > something's amiss.
>
> > > > McLean County recorder Dewey Oster said he has seen less foot traffic
> > > > from landmen researching minerals acres, but he doesn't know whether
> > > > it's due to available land all leased up, or less interest in that far
> > > > range of the Bakken play.
>
> > > > Brenda Cook, the recorder for Mercer County - an expansion zone where
> > > > leasing had been fairly hot and one rig moved in last month - said
> > > > she's seeing half the number of landmen in the past few weeks.
>
> > > > She said she thinks oil prices are one aspect, but says, "They may
> > > > have leased up the land they're looking for."
>
> > > > Landmen tend to be tightlipped, she said.
>
> > > > In Dunn County, recorder Chris Larsen said she's recording 20 leases
> > > > day, down from a peak of 50.
>
> > > > She thinks it's less a price issue than one of opportunity.
>
> > > > "I think it's because everybody is pretty much leased up," she said.
>
> > > > (Reach reporter Lauren Donovan at 888-303-5511 or [EMAIL PROTECTED])- 
> > > > Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Bakken Shale Discussion" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bakken-shale-discussion?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to