I remember a time that if you cashed a check it became a binding agreement, the same thing as signing on the dotted line. You may want to think about that before you go to the bank and try to cash it.
> > as far as i know, the irs treats lease bonus the same as royalty, i.e. > not subject to self employement (social security) taxes. > > On Oct 28, 6:40 am, elwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> probably not a royalty on production check, but maybe a lease bonus ? >> >> a royalty on production check would have a statement showing: volumes >> prices, taxes and net$. >> >> On Oct 28, 3:55 am, "paul giannotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> > You don't really expect us to believe that "royalty check" story? Do you? >> >> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:16 PM, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > Are you sure your rights are on section 7 not 9. There is a long >> > > lateral from the Active Hess RS-State section 16 well that extends >> > > into section 9 on a 1280 acre stand up spacing that would be paying >> > > royalties file number 16881 but I do not see any activity on or near >> > > section 7 of 156 90. >> >> > > On Oct 27, 5:33 pm, rookie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > ok!!!!!!!! its suppose to be mine,, give it here >> >> > > > On Oct 27, 5:18 pm, "Sweet, But Crude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > > Seriously:http://www.hess.com/aboutus/contact_hess.htm >> >> > > > > I would jump all over this one. Perhaps the Hess hope is the "haze" >> > > > > of "found money" might make you less inclined to dig deeply into >> > > > > details, as you need to do. >> >> > > > > Best of luck, >> >> > > > > Tom >> > > > > "Sweet, But Crude" >> >> > > > > On Oct 27, 5:00 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> > > > > > I received a royalty check in the mail today and do not know why.? >> > > Nothing was explained on it it is from an oil company in Texas >> called Hess >> > > Incorporated.? I was not aware that anything was drilled on our mineral >> > > rights as of yet. >> >> > > > > > Does anyone know anything about the 156 N, 90 and Section 7?? >> >> > > > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > > To: [email protected] >> > > > > > Sent: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 3:51 pm >> > > > > > Subject: Re: Well results in James Hill Clear Water >> >> > > > > > Twp, Range, section? >> >> > > > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > > > From: Biteme65 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > > > To: Bakken Shale Discussion < >> > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > > Sent: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:10 am >> > > > > > Subject: Well results in James Hill Clear Water >> >> > > > > > Hi, I am wondering about Well results for James Hill Clear Water >> > > North >> >> > > > > > of Stanley.? >> >> > > > > > Thanks >> >> > > > > > McCain or Obama? Stay updated on coverage of the Presidential race >> > > while you browse - Download Now!- Hide quoted text - >> >> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bakken Shale Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bakken-shale-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
