I just got off the phone with one of the principals at the Gale well
and he said (I think) the well had just been refractured.  It had the
same kind of problem as the Veigel well-the sanding off condition. He
didn't know the results of the refracture and didn't mention anything
about any production in August.

The reason I am particularly interested in the Gale is because of the
numerous Three Forks wells drilled around the Killdeer Mountains none
have reported in, other than the Bice.  All information I have would
point towards the Gale being good but how good?

The information I have about the Veigel 1-9H being a good producer of
crude oil and possibly an excellent producer of natural gas is
unofficial. But the sources are reliable, one of them being the person
who arranges the gas collection lines in the territory.

On Oct 30, 7:39 am, page2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks everyone for all the valuable information.  I especially like
> the spirited discussions!  Only one comment on the tax money going
> back to the producing counties for roads, property tax relief, etc. It
> won't happen until they start drilling horizontals under the cities of
> Grand Forks, Fargo, and Bismarck.  The major population areas have the
> votes to see that the major share of tax money will improve their
> infrastructure, schools, universities etc. Western North Dakota will
> only get a small portion of the tax monies.
>
> Congratulations Swell Packer on the Veigel production!!  Does anyone
> have information on what the Gale1-32H and the Rodney 1-29H (the
> sister wells that were frac'd on the same day around the same time as
> the Veigel) are producing oil and gas wise?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Bakken Shale Discussion" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bakken-shale-discussion?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to