yes, i asked the NDIC to send them to me. i had no idea that exhibits are available on their website.
suzanne On Oct 31, 2:14 pm, go-devil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The exhibits are not available on the website and wont be for sometime > nor their findings. > I trust you have contacted someone at the NDIC and had them sent you > them. Thanks > > On Oct 31, 1:53 pm, shamlet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > i should say the exhibits for 10545 are available now. > > > the exhibits for 10685 will probably be available the day after the > > court hearing. > > > the exhibits for case 10545 will definitely help you understand what > > they are saying in case 10685, if you note that the hess exhibits for > > 10545 and the petrohunt exhibits for 10545 did not match in field > > boundaries, but that hess did propose wells for the surrounding wells > > of the smaller hess field. > > > suzanne > > > On Oct 31, 1:34 pm, shamlet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > the exhibits are available now and the NDIC has mailed them to me > > > already. i received them yesterday. > > > > suzanne > > > > On Oct 31, 11:01 am, go-devil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > #10545 will not be available for another month. > > > > > On Oct 31, 10:36 am, shamlet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > this is a completer case, as far as i can see. > > > > > case 10545 exhibits from hess and petrohunt didn't match. hess' > > > > > exhibit of the east tioga oil field was more restrictive in boundary > > > > > but their proposed wells (of 1 per spacing unit) did include much of > > > > > this new proposed field. petrohunt's exhibit of this same field was > > > > > larger and the proposed wells were 2 per spacing units. > > > > > > if you are interested in this application, i would urge you to get the > > > > > exhibits from case 10545 so that you can see what they planned. > > > > > > one of the reasons that hess' exhibits were more restrictive may have > > > > > to do with hess' interest in each spacing unit. therefore, it might > > > > > not be hess that drills these new proposed spacing units. > > > > > > i am pleased because all of our mineral rights will probably be > > > > > drilled in this field now, limited by the # of drilling rigs > > > > > available. > > > > > > i will listen to the hearing and request a copy of the exhibits once > > > > > the hearing has been conducted. > > > > > > suzanne > > > > > > On Oct 30, 5:16 pm, go-devil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Not permits but spacing for possible permits. > > > > > > Case No. 10685: > > > > > > Application of Petro-Hunt, LLC for an order extending the boundaries > > > > > > of the > > > > > > North Tioga Field to include Sections 6, 18 and 19, T.159N., R.93W.; > > > > > > Sections 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 22, 23 and 24, > > > > > > T.159N., R. > > > > > > 94W.; > > > > > > Section 31, T.160N., R.93W.; Sections 25, 26, 27, 34, 35 and 36, T. > > > > > > 160N., > > > > > > R.94W.; the E/2 of Section 8, the W/2 and the SE/4 of Section 30, T. > > > > > > 159N., > > > > > > R.94W.; and the NE/4 of Section 20, T.160N., R.94W., Burke County, > > > > > > ND; > > > > > > establishing 18 1280-acre spacing units in Zone IV of the North > > > > > > Tioga- > > > > > > Bakken Pool described as Sections 18 and 19, T.159N., R.93W.; > > > > > > Sections > > > > > > 1 > > > > > > and 12; Sections 2 and 11; Sections 3 and 10; Sections 4 and 9; > > > > > > Sections 7 > > > > > > and 18; Sections 8 and 17; Sections 13 and 24; Sections 14 and 23; > > > > > > Sections > > > > > > 15 and 22; Sections 19 and 30, T.159N., R.94W.; Sections 20 and 29; > > > > > > Sections 25 and 36; Sections 26 and 35; Sections 27 and 34; Sections > > > > > > 28 and > > > > > > 33, T.160N., R.94W.; and Section 31, T.160N., R.93W., together with > > > > > > Section 6, T.159N., R.93W.; and Section 32, T.160N., R.94W., > > > > > > together > > > > > > with Section 5, T.159N., R.94W., and for such other relief as is > > > > > > appropriate.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bakken Shale Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bakken-shale-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
