Here's another from Unit Pet that I think is, more than likely, a
Bakken or TFS:
"#17739  -  UNIT PETROLEUM COMPANY, FUNKE 1, SENE 25-160N-86W,
RENVILLE CO., 1980' FNL
and 660' FEL, WC, WILDCAT, 'Tight Hole', 1748' Ground, API
#33-075-01401, (Approved:
10/22/2008)"

On Nov 7, 1:16 pm, Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My interpretation of the log chart in question is that it looks like
> the Three Forks is only separated from the Middle Bakken by a few feet
> of Lower Bakken Shale.  Whereas, in other areas the Lower Bakken Shale
> is 100 feet thick.
>
> Whether that is good news or not, I suspect it will take a drill bit
> to find out.  Based on what I have heard in various driller conference
> calls any frac job of a horizontal hole may extend up to 100 feet
> vertically.  So if they drill a horizontal in the Middle Bakken, then
> a frac job should easily migrate into the Three Forks in this area.
>
> This formation may be similar to the Hess wells directly to the east
> in Ward County.  Those wells supposedly tested the Three Forks and
> results have been reported to be mediocre.
>
> On Nov 7, 7:19 am, Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Regarding the Stratigraphy chart on page 26 
> > ofhttp://www.bexp3d.com/IR_pres.pdf,
> > the listing to the far right is Shell's Dewing T160N-R86W-S15.  Does
> > the data mean this area is a good Bakken/TFS prospect? In comparison
> > to the other listed areas??
>
> > I'm assuming that since the drilling target would be at a shallower
> > depth than the others it would be a more attractive prospect?
>
> > Thanks for any info.  Our mineral rights are in this same area so this
> > would help in accessing our prospects..- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Bakken Shale Discussion" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bakken-shale-discussion?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to