Hello, Jean-Luc! I by no means didn't want to diminish your report. In fact, it's the real help to de-bug the product.
On 25.11.2006 15:08:44, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: > Le 25.11.2006 09:54:17, Ildar Mulyukov a écrit : >> On 24.11.2006 17:11:00, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: >>> I've deleted my filters then rebuilt them one by one. And this >>> fixes the problem (I remarked balsa crashed when there was a lot >>> of incoming mail being processed and sorted by the filters) >> >> Use the procmail, Luke! > > I use procmail for the spam... > But balsa filters are very handy... much easier to manage than the > cryptic procmail syntax. And as long as the feature exists, it should > work. Agree. But In My Humble Opinion, having MANY filters is a good reason to redesign your mail-flow in order to make it * reliable * flexible * MTA/MUA/etc. independable So the unix-way here is: spend 1 hour for configuration, then use it forever. ;) >> Though balsa tends to take features of them all, it's still a MUA, >> not a Mail Processing program. > > I disagree. MUA is also to process adn sort mail. > Orherwise, you can alos use mailx to do everything. > And even puch some cards to enter your data ;) (I began this way) Didn't understand everything, but agree. > There is a rule when writing a program: the user *never* does a > mistake. Agree. > Or, if you prefer, there are no action that should lead to a > program crash. Yes > In this case, if the filter format in the config file is wrong, > balsa should tell "invalid config file format or something like > that"... Maybe it's a good idea to make a stopper or warning, when the number of filters > 10? BR Ildar -- Ildar Mulyukov, free SW designer/programmer/packager ========================================= email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ALT Linux Sisyphus http://www.sisyphus.ru ========================================= _______________________________________________ balsa-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
