On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 21:19 +0100, Pawel Salek wrote: > On 03/06/2009 04:45:57 AM, Mark A. Flacy wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 23:45 -0600, Mark A. Flacy wrote: > > > [cut] > > > Well, I ended up running wireshark. > > > > > > Traces available upon request (after a delay for editing to remove > > > e-mail addresses.) Balsa had split a BDAT message across 2 > > packets; I > > > don't know if that's a problem. I'll see what evolution does with > > this > > > message. > > > > Well, evolution doesn't appear to support or use BDAT. At least > > according to the trace. > > BDAT [1] data can and will be split on many packets if there is enough > data. BDAT is really like DATA command except that it saves the > receiving server from looking for the ending dot. It looks like a bug > in the SMTP server you use which apparently is not that uncommon[2]...
OK, fair enough. But... 1) I couldn't figure this out from any balsa command line options. I *had* to use wireshark to watch the trace. 2) If it isn't that uncommon for SMTP servers to mishandle BDAT, then I should be able to configure balsa to not use it. It's rather annoying to fire up evolution to respond to the balsa mailing list. -- Mark A. Flacy <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ balsa-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
