In reply to Pawel:

Can you please report balsa's version?

2.4.12

Could you also send the output produced by balsa with "-D" option?

I've attached a file, debugIMAP.txt, containing the output of a short session. The Koumbit mailboxes came up readonly in this session. I'm not sure how this list deals with attachments, but the file is too long to inline.

The most interesting parts are responses to "SELECT" IMAP command, whether they look like "OK [READ-ONLY] SELECT", or "OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT This is how balsa is informed whether the mailbox is writable or read only.

I did not understand the file thoroughly, but a search showed a number of "READ-WRITE"s, and no "READ-ONLY"s. I am confused regarding which "SELECT" command goes to which IMAP server, but there is one mailbox name that is only associated with Koumbit, called "ToFileLater". That one appears to be selected as READ-WRITE. In the session producing this output, the Balsa GUI showed all Koumbit mailboxes "readonly", and I was unable to delete or move messages. In a separate message window, the delete button was grayed out.

To make sure that the Koumbit mailboxes are truly "SELECT"ed, I started up Balsa, then explicitly selected the 6 Koumbit mailboxes one after the other: INBOX, INBOX.Drafts, INBOX.Queue, INBOX.Sent, INBOX.ToFileLater, INBOX.Trash. The Balsa GUI showed them all "readonly".

After Balsa has run for a long time (such as 6 hours), the troublesome mailboxes spontaneously switch to read/write. Alas, this makes debugging runs troublesome, as I lose the read/write status each time I restart.

Cheers,

Mike O'Donnell
(process:17147): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property 
GnomeProgram::sm-connect after class was initialised

(process:17147): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property 
GnomeProgram::show-crash-dialog after class was initialised

(process:17147): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property 
GnomeProgram::display after class was initialised

(process:17147): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property 
GnomeProgram::default-icon after class was initialised
** Message: init gpgme version 1.4.2
** Message: protocol OpenPGP: engine /usr/bin/gpg (home (null), version 1.4.14)
** Message: protocol CMS: engine /usr/bin/gpgsm (home (null), version (null))
** Message: protocol GPGCONF: engine /usr/bin/gpgconf (home (null), version 
2.0.20)
** Message: protocol Assuan: engine /tmp/gpg-AfId1L/S.gpg-agent (home 
!GPG_AGENT, version 1.0)
** Message: gpg-agent found: /tmp/gpg-AfId1L/S.gpg-agent:3287:1
** Message: OpenPGP protocol supported
** Message: built without CMS (aka S/MIME) protocol support
Status: Connected (1382631437)
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf", line 14: reading 
configurations from ~/.fonts.conf is deprecated.
IMAP S: * OK Gimap ready for requests from 69.17.22.172 p6if3050791igh.5
IMAP C: 1 CAPABILITY
IMAP S: * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UNSELECT IDLE NAMESPACE QUOTA ID XLIST CHILDREN 
X-GM-EXT-1 XYZZY SASL-IR AUTH=XOAUTH AUTH=XOAUTH2 AUTH=PLAIN 
AUTH=PLAIN-CLIENTTOKEN
1 OK Thats all she wrote! p6if3050791igh.5
IMAP C: 2 AUTHENTICATE PLAIN (password hidden)
IMAP S: * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UIDPLUS CHILDREN NAMESPACE 
THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT QUOTA IDLE AUTH=PLAIN ACL 
ACL2=UNION] Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-2010 Double Precision, Inc.  See 
COPYING for distribution information.
IMAP C: 3 AUTHENTICATE PLAIN
IMAP S: + 
IMAP C: 
bWljaGFlbF9vZG9ubmVsbEBvZG9ubmVsbC5rb3VtYml0Lm9yZwBtaWNoYWVsX29kb25uZWxsQG9kb25uZWxsLmtvdW1iaXQub3JnAEtvdW1iaXRAUG5pbg==
IMAP S: 3 OK LOGIN Ok.
IMAP C: 4 SELECT "INBOX"
5 MYRIGHTS "INBOX"
IMAP S: * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UNSELECT IDLE NAMESPACE QUOTA ID XLIST CHILDREN 
X-GM-EXT-1 UIDPLUS COMPRESS=DEFLATE ENABLE MOVE CONDSTORE ESEARCH
2 OK [email protected] Michael O'Donnell authenticated (Success)
IMAP C: 6 COMPRESS DEFLATE
IMAP S: * FLAGS (nonjunk \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (nonjunk \* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] 
Limited
* 25 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1355513549] Ok
* OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL
4 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok
IMAP S: * MYRIGHTS "INBOX" "acdilrsw"
5 OK MYRIGHTS completed.
IMAP C: 7 SEARCH 1:25 UNSEEN
8 SEARCH 1:25 DELETED
IMAP S: * SEARCH 23 24 25
7 OK SEARCH done.
* SEARCH
8 OK SEARCH done.
IMAP C: 9 THREAD REFERENCES UTF-8 Undeleted
IMAP S: * THREAD 
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)
9 OK THREAD done.
IMAP C: a SORT (Date) UTF-8 1:25
IMAP S: * SORT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
a OK SORT done.
IMAP S: 6 OK Success
IMAP C: b LIST "INBOX" "%"
IMAP C: c FETCH 23 (BODYSTRUCTURE BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS.NOT (DATE SUBJECT 
FROM SENDER REPLY-TO TO CC BCC IN-REPLY-TO MESSAGE-ID)])
IMAP S: * 23 FETCH (BODYSTRUCTURE (("text" "plain" ("charset" "us-ascii") NIL 
"lilypond-devel Digest, Vol 131, Issue 44" "7bit" 486 13 NIL NIL NIL)("text" 
"plain" ("charset" "us-ascii") NIL "Today's Topics (4 messages)" "7bit" 335 8 
NIL NIL NIL)(("message" "rfc822" NIL NIL NIL "8bit" 4011 ("Thu, 24 Oct 2013 
00:20:01 +0200" "Re: Make sure slurs actually avoid stafflines. (issue 
15400049)" (("=?UTF-8?Q?Janek_Warcho=C5=82?=" NIL "janek.lilypond" 
"gmail.com")) (("=?UTF-8?Q?Janek_Warcho=C5=82?=" NIL "janek.lilypond" 
"gmail.com")) (("=?UTF-8?Q?Janek_Warcho=C5=82?=" NIL "janek.lilypond" 
"gmail.com")) (("Werner Lemberg" NIL "lemzwerg" "googlemail.com")("Trevor 
Daniels" NIL "tdanielsmusic" "googlemail.com")("Keith OHara" NIL "k-ohara5a5a" 
"oco.net")("Han-Wen Nienhuys" NIL "hanwenn" "gmail.com")("David Kastrup" NIL 
"dak" "gnu.org")) (("[email protected]" NIL "reply" 
"codereview-hr.appspotmail.com")("LilyPond Development Team" NIL 
"lilypond-devel" "gnu.org")) NIL "<[email protected]>" 
"<CANYDDppvchLfT=sO4w=hzglyk-3mluclnsqdw9mtgk0hys3...@mail.gmail.com>") ("text" 
"plain" ("charset" "utf-8") NIL NIL "8bit" 3165 77 NIL NIL NIL) 96 NIL NIL 
NIL)("message" "rfc822" NIL NIL NIL "8bit" 2794 ("Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:33:43 
+0000" "Re: Make sure slurs actually avoid stafflines. (issue 15400049)" ((NIL 
NIL "k-ohara5a5a" "oco.net")) ((NIL NIL "k-ohara5a5a" "oco.net")) ((NIL NIL 
"janek.lilypond" "gmail.com")(NIL NIL "lemzwerg" "googlemail.com")(NIL NIL 
"tdanielsmusic" "googlemail.com")(NIL NIL "k-ohara5a5a" "oco.net")(NIL NIL 
"hanwenn" "gmail.com")(NIL NIL "dak" "gnu.org")(NIL NIL "lilypond-devel" 
"gnu.org")(NIL NIL "reply" "codereview-hr.appspotmail.com")) ((NIL NIL 
"janek.lilypond" "gmail.com")(NIL NIL "lemzwerg" "googlemail.com")(NIL NIL 
"tdanielsmusic" "googlemail.com")(NIL NIL "hanwenn" "gmail.com")(NIL NIL "dak" 
"gnu.org")) ((NIL NIL "reply" "codereview-hr.appspotmail.com")(NIL NIL 
"lilypond-devel" "gnu.org")) NIL NIL 
"<[email protected]>") ("text" "plain" ("charset" 
"iso-8859-1" "format" "flowed" "delsp" "yes") NIL NIL "8bit" 2036 53 NIL NIL 
NIL) 70 NIL NIL NIL)("message" "rfc822" NIL NIL NIL "8bit" 1207 ("Thu, 24 Oct 
2013 17:08:39 +0200" "Re: The catastrophe has arrived." (("Joseph Rushton 
Wakeling" NIL "joseph.wakeling" "webdrake.net")) (("Joseph Rushton Wakeling" 
NIL "joseph.wakeling" "webdrake.net")) (("Joseph Rushton Wakeling" NIL 
"joseph.wakeling" "webdrake.net")) ((NIL NIL "lilypond-devel" "gnu.org")) NIL 
NIL "<[email protected]>" "<[email protected]>") 
("text" "plain" ("charset" "iso-8859-1" "format" "flowed") NIL NIL "7bit" 704 
15 NIL NIL NIL) 29 NIL NIL NIL)("message" "rfc822" NIL NIL NIL "8bit" 1793 
("Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:24:50 +0200" "Re: The catastrophe has arrived." (("David 
Kastrup" NIL "dak" "gnu.org")) (("David Kastrup" NIL "dak" "gnu.org")) (("David 
Kastrup" NIL "dak" "gnu.org")) (("Joseph Rushton Wakeling" NIL 
"joseph.wakeling" "webdrake.net")) ((NIL NIL "lilypond-devel" "gnu.org")) NIL 
"<[email protected]> (Joseph Rushton Wakeling's  message of \"Thu, 
24 Oct 2013 17:08:39 +0200\")" "<[email protected]>") ("text" 
"plain" NIL NIL NIL "8bit" 1218 29 NIL NIL NIL) 44 NIL NIL NIL) "digest" 
("boundary" "===============2717179359037201100==") NIL NIL)("text" "plain" 
("charset" "us-ascii") NIL "Digest Footer" "7bit" 157 4 NIL NIL NIL) "mixed" 
("boundary" "===============6099193986471094287==") NIL NIL) 
BODY[HEADER.FIELDS.NOT ("DATE" "SUBJECT" "FROM" "SENDER" "REPLY-TO" "TO" "CC" 
"BCC" "IN-REPLY-TO" "MESSAGE-ID")] {2270}
Return-Path: 
<SRS0+e0a2a2104d5214a4=UC=gnu.org=lilypond-devel-bounces+michael_odonnell=acm....@srs.acm.org>
X-Original-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from acmsmtp01.acm.org (ACMSMTP01.acm.org [64.238.147.78])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by bureau.koumbit.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5B8C1E43B09
        for <[email protected]>; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:01:02 
-0400 (EDT)
Received: from psmtp.com
        by acmsmtp01.acm.org (ACM Email Forwarding Service) with SMTP (SSL) id 
1201310241201001749
        for <[email protected]>; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:01:00 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) (using TLSv1) by 
na3sys009amx176.postini.com ([74.125.148.10]) with SMTP;
        Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:00:59 GMT
Received: from localhost ([::1]:55022 helo=lists.gnu.org)
        by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
        (envelope-from 
<[email protected]>)
        id 1VZNLG-0003sK-Cv
        for [email protected]; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:00:58 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6099193986471094287=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: [email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on LilyPond development <lilypond-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/lilypond-devel>,
        <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel>,
        <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: [email protected]
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels:     (S:99.90000/99.90000 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-dkim: 0 skipped:not-enabled
X-pstn-settings: 5 (2.0000:2.0000) s cv gt4 gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[email protected]> forward (user good) 
[3430/160] 

)
c OK FETCH completed.
IMAP C: d FETCH 23 (BODY[1.MIME] BODY[1])
IMAP S: * 23 FETCH (BODY[1.MIME] {163}
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: lilypond-devel Digest, Vol 131, Issue 44

 BODY[1] {486}
Send lilypond-devel mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of lilypond-devel digest..."
)
* 23 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen))
d OK FETCH completed.
IMAP C: e FETCH 23 (BODY[2.MIME] BODY[2])
IMAP S: * 23 FETCH (BODY[2.MIME] {150}
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Today's Topics (4 messages)

 BODY[2] {335}
Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Make sure slurs actually avoid stafflines. (issue
      15400049) (Janek Warcho?)
   2. Re: Make sure slurs actually avoid stafflines. (issue
      15400049) ([email protected])
   3. Re: The catastrophe has arrived. (Joseph Rushton Wakeling)
   4. Re: The catastrophe has arrived. (David Kastrup)
)
e OK FETCH completed.
IMAP C: f FETCH 23 (BODY[3.1.HEADER] BODY[3.1.1])
IMAP S: * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "INBOX"
b OK Success
IMAP S: * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UIDPLUS CHILDREN NAMESPACE 
THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT QUOTA IDLE AUTH=PLAIN ACL 
ACL2=UNION] Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-2010 Double Precision, Inc.  See 
COPYING for distribution information.
IMAP C: 10 AUTHENTICATE PLAIN
IMAP S: * 23 FETCH (BODY[3.1.HEADER] {846}
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Janek_Warcho=C5=82?= <[email protected]>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "[email protected]"
        <[email protected]>,
        LilyPond Development Team <[email protected]>
To: Werner Lemberg <[email protected]>,
        Trevor Daniels <[email protected]>, 
        Keith OHara <[email protected]>, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[email protected]>,
        David Kastrup <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 00:20:01 +0200
Message-ID: <CANYDDppvchLfT=sO4w=hzglyk-3mluclnsqdw9mtgk0hys3...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: Make sure slurs actually avoid stafflines. (issue 15400049)
Message: 1

 BODY[3.1.1] {3165}
Hi Keith,

2013/10/23  <[email protected]>:
>
> On 2013/10/23 04:22:22, Keith wrote:
>> The commit message makes it sound like there was a blunder in the
>> direction that
>>
>> the old code moved the slur.  I don't see any such problem.
>>
>> It looks like the old code intentionally moved the middle of the slur
>> always in
>> the direction of the slur, so the curvature would increase.  It simply
>> didn't
>> move far enough, because the curve does not move as far as the control
>> points.
>
> Uh, how had you came to this conclusion?  It's absurd.  Take this
> example:
>
> \relative c'' {
>   c8( b a2) c8( b)
>   \slurUp
>   d,2( f)
>   a2 c
> }
>
> Here's how these slurs look with the correcting function turned off
> altogether - none is crossing the staffline:
> http://lilypond.googlecode.com/issues/attachment?aid=36280006000&name=no-correction.png&token=I4nuTyt1y5gR8lDgjQPipN-8Hm8%3A1382562402092&inline=1
>
> They are just a bit too close to the staffline, that's all.  They should
> be flattened, but the previous version of the algorithm decided that
> such slurs should have their curvature increased, which resulted in
> this:
> http://lilypond.googlecode.com/issues/attachment?aid=36280006001&name=previous-correction.png&token=PeJAER3pHxyZQAqN_3vKl4F2fUY%3A1382562402092&inline=1
>
> Can you tell me in what way this made any sense?  Making the slurs even
> more curved would make them even more ugly.
>
> Also, please look at the example in our essay:
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/essay/automated-engraving#improvement-by-benchmarking
> Note that Baerenreiter puts the slur in the 2nd measure under the
> staffline, just as i want it to be.

I hope that you won't interpret the harsh tone of my email as a personal attack.
I spent *8 hours* (measured with a watch) reading slur code and
working on this patch.  I got irritated when i saw your email, because
it seemed to me that when i said that something was broken you didn't
trust my words enough to double-check your doubts.

I realize that you probably didn't mean it.  Unfortunately this
resonated with some of my other experiences from LilyPond development,
when
a) my questions quite often didn't get answered desipte being short
and well-formulated,
b) my plain, well-commented and carefully git-crafted patches
sometimes don't get reviewed for months,
c) my diagnoses and observations are quite often not trusted without a
lot of disussion and necessity to provide lots of scanned examples,
d) it seems that people generally don't care or notice things that i
care about and notice (for example when i say "many slurs, beams and
ties in LilyPond are really ugly" many peopIMAP S: + 
le don't believe me - as if
they trusted LilyPond's decisionIMAP C: 
bWljaGFlbF9vZG9ubmVsbEBvZG9ubmVsbC5rb3VtYml0Lm9s more than myyZ 
wjBtauWNodgeYmWVesX29nkb2t5 u-Z Wxsor Qat leasGt9kb
so 2i5utZ WxssLemtvedms Wt1oia XQumbe3Jn)AEtv.
d
This iWs1ia XRAUaG5plblg r=e=
ally unfortunate; of course you're not responsible for
this situation.  But it made me frustrated nevertheless, so i decided
to explain myself.

Anyway, be sure that i *do appreciate* getting reviews, and i'm
honored to see Han-Wen reviewing my patch!

good night
Janek



)
f OK FETCH completed.
IMAP C: 11 FETCH 23 (BODY[3.2.HEADER] BODY[3.2.1])
IMAP S: 10 OK LOGIN Ok.
IMAP C: 12 SELECT "INBOX.Trash"
13 MYRIGHTS "INBOX.Trash"
IMAP S: * 23 FETCH (BODY[3.2.HEADER] {758}
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: [email protected]
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected], 
        [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:33:43 +0000
Reply-To: [email protected], [email protected],
        [email protected], [email protected],
        [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
        [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Subject: Re: Make sure slurs actually avoid stafflines. (issue 15400049)
Message: 2

 BODY[3.2.1] {2036}

https://codereview.appspot.com/15400049/diff/1/lily/slur-configuration.cc
File lily/slur-configuration.cc (left):

https://codereview.appspot.com/15400049/diff/1/lily/slur-configuration.cc#oldcode62
lily/slur-configuration.cc:62:
On 2013/10/23 04:22:23, Keith wrote:
> > but the function was broken: it only moved slurs in one direction

We concluded the same thing about the old code.  The old code intended
to move slurs in one direction only.

I was only confused by your comment. I interpreted 'broken' to mean
"failing to to what was intended".

https://codereview.appspot.com/15400049/diff/1/lily/slur-configuration.cc
File lily/slur-configuration.cc (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/15400049/diff/1/lily/slur-configuration.cc#newcode60
lily/slur-configuration.cc:60: // rather than decrease, because we want
to avoid too flat slurs.
On 2013/10/23 21:41:24, janek wrote:

> Precisely because min_gap_above_staffline > min_gap_below_staffline
> we are more likely to increase than decrease curvature.

Okay.  So then the comment "The function is implemented so that we're
more likely to increase curvature" refers to the default values.

https://codereview.appspot.com/15400049/diff/1/lily/slur-configuration.cc#newcode84
lily/slur-configuration.cc:84: Real const slur_th = state.thickness_ *
staff_th * 10;
On 2013/10/23 21:41:24, janek wrote:
> On 2013/10/23 04:22:23, Keith wrote:
> > Why 10?  Is that the thickness of the fattest part of the slur?

> No, it's because staff_th is measured in staffspaces, while
state.thickness_
> appears to be measured in 1/10ths of staffline-thicknesses

state.thickness_ already has the \layout{line-thickness} as a factor in
its initialization in Slur_score_state::fill().

Staff_symbol_referencer::line_thickness() returns something that scales
with
\layout{line-thickness}

So, it looks like you have two factors of \layout{line-thickness} and
the *10 roughly cancels one of them.

https://codereview.appspot.com/15400049/



)
11 OK FETCH completed.
IMAP C: 14 FETCH 23 (BODY[3.3.HEADER] BODY[3.3.1])
IMAP S: * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited
* 0 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1355513549] Ok
* OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL
12 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok
IMAP S: * 23 FETCH (BODY[3.3.HEADER] {503}
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joseph Rushton Wakeling <[email protected]>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [email protected]
References: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:08:39 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: The catastrophe has arrived.
Message: 3

 BODY[3.3.1] {704}
On 23/10/13 18:22, David Kastrup wrote:
> Of course, this was sort of predictable.  Would we have been in time if
> we had immediately created a backport of the configure patch and named
> the result 2.16.3?

I think it would depend on when you got it out by.  As far as I can tell Ubuntu 
just imports Lilypond direct from Debian Unstable and doesn't make any direct 
intervention in it.  I don't think there's even a volunteer contributor who 
takes any responsibility (which there is for e.g. Frescobaldi).

There have been a bunch of occasions in the past when Ubuntu hasn't picked up 
on 
an upgraded stable release of Lilypond despite it being available, for exactly 
this reason.



)
14 OK FETCH completed.
IMAP C: 15 FETCH 23 (BODY[3.4.HEADER] BODY[3.4.1])
IMAP S: * 23 FETCH (BODY[3.4.HEADER] {575}
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: David Kastrup <[email protected]>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: [email protected]
To: Joseph Rushton Wakeling <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> (Joseph Rushton Wakeling's
        message of "Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:08:39 +0200")
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:24:50 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: The catastrophe has arrived.
Message: 4

 BODY[3.4.1] {1218}
Joseph Rushton Wakeling <[email protected]> writes:

> On 23/10/13 18:22, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Of course, this was sort of predictable.  Would we have been in time if
>> we had immediately created a backport of the configure patch and named
>> the result 2.16.3?
>
> I think it would depend on when you got it out by.  As far as I can
> tell Ubuntu just imports Lilypond direct from Debian Unstable and
> doesn't make any direct intervention in it.

But they take the source package and compile themselves.  Debian has
already taken a fixed Metapost long ago, but Ubuntu has not updated the
TeXlive binaries in spite of me reporting the problem.

> There have been a bunch of occasions in the past when Ubuntu hasn't
> picked up on an upgraded stable release of Lilypond despite it being
> available, for exactly this reason.

Well, they upgraded to latest stable alright this time, and the
packaging looks pretty convincing.  But whether or not they upgraded
LilyPond would have made no difference to the situation with the broken
fonts: it would have just been the same if they had compiled an older
version of LilyPond with that version of Metapost.

-- 
David Kastrup



)
15 OK FETCH completed.
IMAP C: 16 FETCH 23 (BODY[4.MIME] BODY[4])
IMAP S: * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ ID ENABLE AUTH=LOGIN AUTH=PLAIN 
SASL-IR] tottenham Cyrus IMAP v2.4.12-Debian-2.4.12-2 server ready
IMAP C: 17 AUTHENTICATE PLAIN (password hidden)
IMAP S: * MYRIGHTS "INBOX.Trash" "acdilrsw"
13 OK MYRIGHTS completed.
IMAP S: 17 OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ ID ENABLE ACL RIGHTS=kxte QUOTA 
MAILBOX-REFERRALS NAMESPACE UIDPLUS NO_ATOMIC_RENAME UNSELECT CHILDREN 
MULTIAPPEND BINARY CATENATE CONDSTORE ESEARCH SORT SORT=MODSEQ SORT=DISPLAY 
THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES ANNOTATEMORE LIST-EXTENDED WITHIN 
QRESYNC SCAN XLIST URLAUTH URLAUTH=BINARY LOGINDISABLED COMPRESS=DEFLATE IDLE] 
Success (tls protection)
IMAP C: 18 COMPRESS DEFLATE
IMAP S: * 23 FETCH (BODY[4.MIME] {136}
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Digest Footer

 BODY[4] {157}
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
)
16 OK FETCH completed.
IMAP S: 18 OK DEFLATE active
IMAP C: 19 LIST "INBOX" "%"
IMAP S: * LIST (\Noinferiors) "." INBOX
19 OK Completed (0.000 secs 3 calls)
IMAP C: 1a NOOP
IMAP S: 1a OK NOOP completed
IMAP C: 1b THREAD REFERENCES UTF-8 Undeleted
IMAP S: * THREAD 
1b OK THREAD done.
IMAP S: * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UIDPLUS CHILDREN NAMESPACE 
THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT QUOTA IDLE AUTH=PLAIN ACL 
ACL2=UNION] Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-2010 Double Precision, Inc.  See 
COPYING for distribution information.
IMAP C: 1c AUTHENTICATE PLAIN
IMAP S: + 
IMAP C: 
bWljaGFlbF9vZG9ubmVsbEBvZG9ubmVsbC5rb3VtYml0Lm9yZwBtaWNoYWVsX29kb25uZWxsQG9kb25uZWxsLmtvdW1iaXQub3JnAEtvdW1iaXRAUG5pbg==
IMAP S: 1c OK LOGIN Ok.
IMAP C: 1d SELECT "INBOX.Sent"
1e MYRIGHTS "INBOX.Sent"
IMAP S: * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited
* 0 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1355513619] Ok
* OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL
1d OK [READ-WRITE] Ok
* MYRIGHTS "INBOX.Sent" "acdilrsw"
1e OK MYRIGHTS completed.
IMAP C: 1f THREAD REFERENCES UTF-8 Undeleted
IMAP S: * THREAD 
1f OK THREAD done.
IMAP S: * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UIDPLUS CHILDREN NAMESPACE 
THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT QUOTA IDLE AUTH=PLAIN ACL 
ACL2=UNION] Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-2010 Double Precision, Inc.  See 
COPYING for distribution information.
IMAP C: 20 AUTHENTICATE PLAIN
IMAP S: + 
IMAP C: 
bWljaGFlbF9vZG9ubmVsbEBvZG9ubmVsbC5rb3VtYml0Lm9yZwBtaWNoYWVsX29kb25uZWxsQG9kb25uZWxsLmtvdW1iaXQub3JnAEtvdW1iaXRAUG5pbg==
IMAP S: 20 OK LOGIN Ok.
IMAP C: 21 SELECT "INBOX.Drafts"
22 MYRIGHTS "INBOX.Drafts"
IMAP S: * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited
* 0 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1355519581] Ok
* OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL
21 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok
* MYRIGHTS "INBOX.Drafts" "acdilrsw"
22 OK MYRIGHTS completed.
IMAP C: 23 THREAD REFERENCES UTF-8 Undeleted
IMAP S: * THREAD 
23 OK THREAD done.
IMAP C: 24 SELECT "INBOX"
25 MYRIGHTS "INBOX"
IMAP S: * 10 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen $Forwarded $MDNSent NonJunk 
Junk $Label4 $Label1 $Label2 $Label3 $Label5)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen $Forwarded 
$MDNSent NonJunk Junk $Label4 $Label1 $Label2 $Label3 $Label5 \*)] Ok
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1173109659] Ok
* OK [UIDNEXT 178164] Ok
* OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 6262] Ok
* OK [URLMECH INTERNAL] Ok
24 OK [READ-WRITE] Completed
IMAP S: * MYRIGHTS INBOX lrswipkxtecda
25 OK Completed
IMAP C: 26 GETACL "INBOX"
IMAP S: * ACL INBOX odonnell lrswipcda cyrus c
26 OK Completed
IMAP C: 27 UID Search 1:10 1:11
IMAP S: * SEARCH 171453 171457 175333 175349 175401 177143 177338 177735 178102 
178148
27 OK Completed (10 msgs in 0.000 secs)
IMAP C: 28 SEARCH RETURN (ALL) 1:10 UNSEEN
29 SEARCH RETURN (ALL) 1:10 DELETED
IMAP S: * ESEARCH (TAG "28")
28 OK Completed (0 msgs in 0.000 secs)
IMAP S: * ESEARCH (TAG "29")
29 OK Completed (0 msgs in 0.000 secs)
IMAP C: 2a THREAD REFERENCES UTF-8 Undeleted
IMAP S: * THREAD (1 2)(3 5 6)(4)(7)(8)(9)(10)
2a OK Completed (10 msgs in 0.000 secs)
IMAP S: * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UIDPLUS CHILDREN NAMESPACE 
THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT QUOTA IDLE AUTH=PLAIN ACL 
ACL2=UNION] Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-2010 Double Precision, Inc.  See 
COPYING for distribution information.
IMAP C: 2b AUTHENTICATE PLAIN
IMAP S: + 
IMAP C: 
bWljaGFlbF9vZG9ubmVsbEBvZG9ubmVsbC5rb3VtYml0Lm9yZwBtaWNoYWVsX29kb25uZWxsQG9kb25uZWxsLmtvdW1iaXQub3JnAEtvdW1iaXRAUG5pbg==
IMAP S: 2b OK LOGIN Ok.
IMAP C: 2c SELECT "INBOX.Queue"
2d MYRIGHTS "INBOX.Queue"
IMAP S: * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited
* 0 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1355630755] Ok
* OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL
2c OK [READ-WRITE] Ok
* MYRIGHTS "INBOX.Queue" "acdilrsw"
2d OK MYRIGHTS completed.
IMAP C: 2e THREAD REFERENCES UTF-8 ALL
IMAP S: * THREAD 
2e OK THREAD done.
IMAP C: 2f SELECT "INBOX"
IMAP S: * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen NonJunk Junk)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen NonJunk Junk 
\*)] Flags permitted.
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 2] UIDs valid.
* 0 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UIDNEXT 1219] Predicted next UID.
* OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 319474]
2f OK [READ-WRITE] INBOX selected. (Success)
IMAP S: * OK Gimap ready for requests from 69.17.22.172 ik4if3186488icb.28
IMAP C: 30 CAPABILITY
IMAP S: * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UNSELECT IDLE NAMESPACE QUOTA ID XLIST CHILDREN 
X-GM-EXT-1 XYZZY SASL-IR AUTH=XOAUTH AUTH=XOAUTH2 AUTH=PLAIN 
AUTH=PLAIN-CLIENTTOKEN
30 OK Thats all she wrote! ik4if3186488icb.28
IMAP C: 31 AUTHENTICATE PLAIN (password hidden)
IMAP S: * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UNSELECT IDLE NAMESPACE QUOTA ID XLIST CHILDREN 
X-GM-EXT-1 UIDPLUS COMPRESS=DEFLATE ENABLE MOVE CONDSTORE ESEARCH
31 OK [email protected] Michael O'Donnell authenticated (Success)
IMAP C: 32 COMPRESS DEFLATE
IMAP S: 32 OK Success
IMAP C: 33 SELECT "Sent"
IMAP S: * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen NonJunk Junk)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen NonJunk Junk 
\*)] Flags permitted.
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 42] UIDs valid.
* 7 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UIDNEXT 22] Predicted next UID.
* OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 319474]
33 OK [READ-WRITE] Sent selected. (Success)
IMAP C: 34 SEARCH RETURN (ALL) 1:7 UNSEEN
35 SEARCH RETURN (ALL) 1:7 DELETED
IMAP S: * ESEARCH (TAG "34")
34 OK SEARCH completed (Success)
IMAP S: * ESEARCH (TAG "35")
35 OK SEARCH completed (Success)
IMAP S: * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ ID ENABLE AUTH=LOGIN AUTH=PLAIN 
SASL-IR] tottenham Cyrus IMAP v2.4.12-Debian-2.4.12-2 server ready
IMAP C: 36 AUTHENTICATE PLAIN (password hidden)
IMAP S: 36 OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ ID ENABLE ACL RIGHTS=kxte QUOTA 
MAILBOX-REFERRALS NAMESPACE UIDPLUS NO_ATOMIC_RENAME UNSELECT CHILDREN 
MULTIAPPEND BINARY CATENATE CONDSTORE ESEARCH SORT SORT=MODSEQ SORT=DISPLAY 
THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES ANNOTATEMORE LIST-EXTENDED WITHIN 
QRESYNC SCAN XLIST URLAUTH URLAUTH=BINARY LOGINDISABLED COMPRESS=DEFLATE IDLE] 
Success (tls protection)
IMAP C: 37 COMPRESS DEFLATE
IMAP S: 37 OK DEFLATE active
IMAP C: 38 SELECT "Trash"
39 MYRIGHTS "Trash"
IMAP S: * 0 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen Junk NonJunk $Forwarded 
$MDNSent)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen Junk NonJunk 
$Forwarded $MDNSent \*)] Ok
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1177474074] Ok
* OK [UIDNEXT 196727] Ok
* OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 2682] Ok
* OK [URLMECH INTERNAL] Ok
38 OK [READ-WRITE] Completed
IMAP S: * MYRIGHTS Trash lrswipkxtecda
39 OK Completed
IMAP C: 3a GETACL "Trash"
IMAP S: * ACL Trash odonnell lrswipcda cyrus c
3a OK Completed
IMAP C: 3b THREAD REFERENCES UTF-8 ALL
IMAP S: * THREAD
3b OK Completed (0 msgs in 0.000 secs)
IMAP S: * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UIDPLUS CHILDREN NAMESPACE 
THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT QUOTA IDLE AUTH=PLAIN ACL 
ACL2=UNION] Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-2010 Double Precision, Inc.  See 
COPYING for distribution information.
IMAP C: 3c AUTHENTICATE PLAIN
IMAP S: + 
IMAP C: 
bWljaGFlbF9vZG9ubmVsbEBvZG9ubmVsbC5rb3VtYml0Lm9yZwBtaWNoYWVsX29kb25uZWxsQG9kb25uZWxsLmtvdW1iaXQub3JnAEtvdW1iaXRAUG5pbg==
IMAP S: 3c OK LOGIN Ok.
IMAP C: 3d SELECT "INBOX.ToFileLater"
3e MYRIGHTS "INBOX.ToFileLater"
IMAP S: * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited
* 0 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1370612800] Ok
* OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL
3d OK [READ-WRITE] Ok
IMAP S: * MYRIGHTS "INBOX.ToFileLater" "acdilrsw"
3e OK MYRIGHTS completed.
IMAP C: 3f THREAD REFERENCES UTF-8 ALL
IMAP S: * THREAD 
3f OK THREAD done.

(balsa:17147): Gtk-WARNING **: Failed to set text from markup due to error 
parsing markup: Error on line 1: Entity did not end with a semicolon; most 
likely you used an ampersand character without intending to start an entity - 
escape ampersand as &amp;

(balsa:17147): Gtk-WARNING **: Failed to set text from markup due to error 
parsing markup: Error on line 1: Entity did not end with a semicolon; most 
likely you used an ampersand character without intending to start an entity - 
escape ampersand as &amp;

(balsa:17147): Gtk-WARNING **: Failed to set text from markup due to error 
parsing markup: Error on line 1: Entity did not end with a semicolon; most 
likely you used an ampersand character without intending to start an entity - 
escape ampersand as &amp;
IMAP C: 40 EXPUNGE
IMAP C: 41 CLOSE
IMAP S: 40 OK Completed
IMAP S: 41 OK Completed
IMAP C: 42 EXPUNGE
IMAP C: 43 CLOSE
IMAP S: 42 OK Success
IMAP S: 43 OK Returned to authenticated state. (Success)
IMAP C: 44 EXPUNGE
IMAP C: 45 CLOSE
IMAP S: 44 OK Success
IMAP S: 45 OK Returned to authenticated state. (Success)
IMAP C: 46 EXPUNGE
IMAP C: 47 CLOSE
IMAP S: 46 OK Completed
IMAP S: 47 OK Completed
IMAP server compression 574 -> 979 sent  58.6 % over wire
IMAP client compression 238 -> 228 sent  95.8 % over wire
IMAP server compression 359 -> 552 sent  65.0 % over wire
IMAP client compression 113 -> 126 sent 111.5 % over wire
IMAP server compression 324 -> 454 sent  71.4 % over wire
IMAP client compression 61 -> 77 sent 126.2 % over wire
IMAP server compression 326 -> 513 sent  63.5 % over wire
IMAP client compression 111 -> 108 sent  97.3 % over wire
_______________________________________________
balsa-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list

Reply via email to