Hi All! On 02/01/2016 03:18:59 PM Mon, Albrecht Dreß wrote:
Hi Pawel:Am 01.02.16 19:36 schrieb(en) Pawel Salek:I am not sure how to decide whether there is development or not.Sorry if my question sounded too provocative - it wasn't meant that way!Does one patch per year count? :)Well, I actually have a bunch of patches, mostly related to crypto handling (which popped up when I switched to a hardware token for gpg), and a few "real" fixes. I developed them for the Gtk 2 branch, as Gtk3 didn't compile on my system, at least without my dialogue flags patch. One question is whether the Gtk-2 branch will be maintained in the future, or just the Gtk-3 one? I.e. prepare patches for both, or just one of them? Updating the `HACKING´ file would be a good idea, too, imho... Cheers Albrecht.
Sorry about the long absence! Albrecht, I just pushed your patch to the gtk3 branch, so it should build now. Jhbuild revealed some forthcoming deprecations in Gtk 3.20, so I pushed a patch for those, too. Please send gtk3 branch patches--I'll try to not let them gather dust! Best, Peter
pgpARi7ARx3sR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ balsa-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
