On 07/21/2016 12:54:00 PM Thu, Mike Witt wrote:
On 07/21/2016 10:14:03 AM, Jack wrote:
On 2016.07.21 09:36, Mike Witt wrote:
Anybody else seeing extremely slow popmail times with gmail?
(July 20 and 21)

-Mike

I have not noticed any issues.

Magically, after being slow for two days, it fixed itself (AFAICT) the very 
moment I sent the above message. Yay Balsa list :-)

However, I do have a separate question on pop for gmail.  (I thought I had previously 
asked this, but can't find the message now.)  When I first set up my gmail account for 
balsa, gmail complained about some security issue (obviously without providing any useful 
details) and I had to check the "ok to use less secure email client" in the 
gmail configuration before it would let balsa (with popfile) get access.  I'd love to 
know exactly what gmail thinks is deficient in the security used by balsa/popfile, since 
I can't think of what else they could do.

I had to check that "less secure" thing a long time ago too. I haven't seen or had any reason to 
believe there's been any problem on account of it. I don't remember the details now, but at the time I 
convinced myself that there was at least somewhat of a "marketing" component in that "secure 
email client" business. But I'm cynical that way, so I may just be spouting rubbish.

I don't use POP3 with my gmail account, but I also recall having to check that "less 
secure" option a while ago, perhaps when setting up an IMAP connection.

Peter

Thanks for any other suggestions.

Jack
_______________________________________________
balsa-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
_______________________________________________
balsa-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list

Attachment: pgpuKZE81JAX7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
balsa-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list

Reply via email to