Hi Jack, On 05/15/2018 07:16:19 PM Tue, Jack wrote:
Hi Peter,
…
Yes, but I really prefer JWZ threading (even though I think I've found a bug in the algorithm, which I have still not yet fully tracked down.) I would have no problem using flat threading for all IMAP folders, but I suppose that would also require another patch. :-) Or - might it make sense (and be not too difficult) that local mail stores use the configured threading/sorting, but IMAP stores/folders use whatever the server provides? I assume that notification is due to Balsa asking the server if it could thread/sort in the way the configuration is set.
Yes, the imap protocol includes the possibility of server-side threading (THREADING=REFERENCES, Iirc) but many servers (cough, GMail, cough) don't implement it. Balsa handles threading for local mailboxes, but relies on the host for imap. As before, it doesn't have to be that way--we could move the threading code to a place where it was used for any backend that doesn't natively implement it. All comments welcome! Peter
pgpoOE7YhJDID.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ balsa-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
