Hi all, two questions/suggestions regarding Balsa's configuration…
(1) The *only* use of the --with-gnome option seems to be setting the “Categories” items in the *.desktop files. I.e. it looks as if the description of the option is wrong (“…Use GNOME libraries…”), and couldn't we just hard-wire GNOME in the desktop files, or does this trigger any negative side effects? (2) Using the --with-gpgme option, it is possible to build Balsa without any end-to-end cryptography support. However, IMHO any decent MUA should *always* support cryptography these days (like TLS), shouldn't it? I.e. what do you think about making gpgme a mandatory requirement for Balsa? We could keep the option for weird systems where gpgme-config is installed in an uncommon place, though. Apart from the security gain, this would remove tons of conditional code. The only drawback I can think of is the slightly larger binary we produce (if that really matters today). What do you think? Cheers, Albrecht.
pgpz0xwS46VHK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ balsa-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
