Visiting the Gaza strip
Agustín Velloso
Translated by Toni Solo
Aug. 17th, 2008
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/7800

When you approach the Erez frontier post to enter Gaza from the north, 
you notice a concentration camp straightaway even if you may never have 
seen one like the ones turned into museums or educational centres, or 
like the ones that appear in documentaries or photographs.

An observation balloon, innocently painted white, rocks gently to and 
fro in the air over the wall surrounding Gaza. It makes sure no unhappy 
soul moves beyond arbitrary limits set by the camp guards. The visitor 
is overwhelmed by the mammoth steel-reinforced wall. This imprisons a 
million and a half inmates inside an area approximately 38 kilometres 
long and 12 wide at its widest.

Apart from cases you can count on the fingers of one hand, Palestinians 
quite simply cannot pass through Erez. Full stop. Besides, they are not 
allowed out via the South, crossing into Egypt, nor via the West, since 
the Mediterranean Sea is barred to them, nor via the air, since that too 
is likewise barred, despite there being no boats or planes to travel in. 
In any case, the airport was destroyed by the bombs of Israel air power. 
Gazans are not allowed to exit by digging underground either.

Patrolling closely about the ten or so people waiting under a scorching 
sun before a guard post in the middle of open ground about a built-up 
area, various soldiers and plain clothes police, with state of the art 
machine guns at the ready, make very clear the people had better keep 
very still. At the end of a long wait, by loudspeaker, the soldier in 
the armed guard post lets them through into the built-up precinct.

It is like a warehouse, unexpectedly high, air conditioned and with 
various control posts inside, although only one is in use, since not 
enough people go through to warrant operating the rest. One is subjected 
to more waiting despite the absence of movement.

For the Zionist mentality everyone who does not cooperate with the 
system must pay a price. It is not even necessary to be one of their 
declared enemies. In this case, the visitors came from a State with good 
relations of all kinds with Israel, namely the Kingdom of Spain. Their 
documents were in order and they were unarmed. Matters had been 
prearranged with the Israeli authorities via the Spanish Consulate in 
Jerusalem. They also had a return ticket to their country, money for 
their stay and a stated humanitarian purpose for their visit, which 
would last exactly three days.

The reason the Israeli frontier police at Erez waste the foreigners' 
time, is because the Zionists are not enthusiastic about witnesses 
visiting the camp. Foreigners arriving at Erez intending to pass 
through, are indeed that, nothing else. Israelis are forbidden to enter.

Israelis attempt to discourage visitors by many means. If the sight of 
the wall, the wandering machinegun-totting soldiers, the wait in the sun 
do not work, then visitors are subjected to hostile interrogation. From 
behind thick armoured glass, the seated interrogator addresses the 
standing interrogated person.

The questions vary from the reasonable to the comical, "What are you 
doing in Gaza? Have you been to Israel before? Do you speak Russian? Do 
you have a driving license? How many passports do you have? What's your 
boss called?"

 From the higher level floor above, cameras and guards record and 
observe the visitors without being seen. Afterwards people have to go 
individually through a narrow series of metal barriers which the service 
personnel can shut off at will, then another couple of armoured doors 
operated by remote control and - all the while under closed circuit TV 
cameras - one leaves the precinct to enter a metal corridor and finally 
cross through the concrete wall into the Palestinian side.

When returning from Gaza to Israel, the process is the same except that 
one is forced to enter a coffin-like cubicle that is adjusted to one's 
body and in which you have to place yourself, legs apart, arms apart 
above your head. A kind of vertical electronic belt or ribbon goes 
around one's body. It is a procedure as stupid as it is impressive since 
the soldiers know beforehand who the visitors are and why they are 
visiting Gaza.

Entering a devastated Gaza

Entering Gaza, the devastation is stark. In the suffocating heat one 
traverses the remains of bulldozed or partially damaged buildings, mass 
of tangled rusting steel rods, piles of debris, sand, dust everywhere. 
Buildings have been torn down at an arbitrary distance from the border. 
One sees leveled ruins of houses and buildings in an area stretching to 
the horizon, broken only by that imposing wall.

One is not talking about a couple of houses that might have been in the 
way. Thousands of Palestinian houses and buildings have been razed in 
order to leave a way clear for military operations, in order to clear 
them for the so called security reasons. (1)

A taxi takes visitors to the refugee camp at Yabalia, seat of the first 
Intifada that began in December 7th 1987. After winding through the 
streets of various parts of the camp, covered in improvised houses, 
lacking infrastructure and sewage, transport, school or other 
facilities, one arrives at Al Awda hospital, whose name, perhaps 
ironically, means Return. There the hospital management meet you and 
tell about the health situation in the Strip generally and around the 
hospital in particular.

Perhaps it is best not to visit the room with photographs of the 
wounded, mutilated and dead at the hands of the Israeli Occupation, it 
graphically documents the barbarism inflicted by what, according to 
Israeli hagiography, is "the most moral army in the world". (2)

Living conditions in the Gaza concentration camp

Bassam Naim, Minister of Health for the Hamas government, receives 
visitors in his office. There he tells them of the problems caused by 
the international siege of the health system. Even so, the most 
interesting information for the non-healthcare specialist foreign 
visitors, is the political aspect. The Minister clarifies for visitors 
the confusion that exists in the West about the situation in the Gaza Strip.

It is not correct to consider that Gaza is a prison, as some argue in 
Europe. Rather it is indeed a concentration camp, because the inmates of 
European prisons get enough food and adequate medical care. They are 
free from military attack and they are not denied other rights, like 
education. None of that happens in Israeli occupied Gaza.

The Minister offers a further important reflection: the international 
community, not just Israel, is responsible for this situation. Both 
rejected the results of the 2006 elections, regarded as free and fair by 
international observers, and furthermore the "international community" 
looked the other way when Israel committed serious violations of 
international law. And of course, the Minister is right in his 
accusation because according to the law the international community has 
adopted, every country has the obligation to obey it and make sure that 
other member countries obey it too.

On April 4th this year, the Israeli daily paper Ha'aretz published the 
following announcement from the World Health Organization, "Israel has 
refused transit to more sick Palestinians seeking treatment since Hamas 
took control of the Strip and several of them die unnecessarily every 
month."

According to World Health Organization statistics, in 2007, 1627 
patients from Gaza had requests for treatment denied, an increase of
470 compared to requests rejected in 2006. As of August 4th this year, 
225 sick Palestinians have died in Gaza since the siege began, either 
because they could not get the necessary medical supplies, since their 
importation is more controlled than ever, or because they were not 
allowed to travel to hospitals in the West Bank, Israel or Egypt for 
treatment unavailable in Gaza.

On August 1st this year, Ahmed Abu Amra, a three-month-old child, died 
of heart failure because her parents were denied permission to transfer 
him to a specialist hospital in Israel. Within 24 hours another four 
adults died, again because Israel denied permission to obtain treatment 
abroad.

Since 21 June 2008 a tenuous ceasefire has been in place between Israel 
and Gaza, but despite the calmer situation access to medical treatment 
has not improved. The Israeli organization Physicians for Human Rights 
recently stated: "Despite the agreement between Hamas and Israel\205 
there has been no improvement towards patients in Gaza in Israeli 
policy, which seems even to have become worse. To the obstacles imposed 
by the general security service on people who want to leave Gaza for 
medical treatment, patients face more bureaucratic difficulties imposed 
by the army, which prevent them enjoying their right to health." The 
entire Palestinian medical system is undermined by the siege; it ranges 
form the basic access to medical supplies to the impossibility of 
referring patients to specialized treatment.

Although health is not the only social sector seriously debilitated by 
the siege, it illustrates very well that in fact Israel is not defending 
itself against the Palestinians; in fact, what is in evidence is a clear 
policy intent on harming the overall population. Health is a fundamental 
right. If the Palestinians don't get enough to eat; if their health 
needs are not adequately met; if the water purification plants do not 
work because there are no fuels or spare parts; if waste waters are not 
treated; if sanitary conditions deteriorate to such an extent, then life 
turns into mere survival. The shortages caused by the siege go beyond 
medical supplies. They cover food, water, building materials, spare 
parts for basic products, energy, educational materials, in fact everything.

John Ging, director of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for 
Palestinian Refugees in the Near East, UNRWA, explains the situation as 
follows: "UNRWA receives barely 56% of the resources it needs to look 
after the refugees. It supplies 60% of their daily diet, which does not 
meet Western recommendations on personal nutrition."

School classes are so crowded they have to offer two classroom shifts a 
day, so as not to leave any child without basic schooling. Some children 
start at 8.00 and finish at midday. Others then enter and finish at 
16.00. No space or facilities exist for extra- curricular activities, 
either sports or any other kind. Since the facilities are unavailable, 
there is an educational collapse; young people will not be minimally 
prepared. Not only are basic skills affected, but what they learn in the 
moral and political spheres is impinging upon future peaceful relations, 
democracy, human rights. I asked Ging about his opinion of the role of 
the international community and he remarked: "I have invited Solana and 
Blair to visit Gaza and get to know personally the situation of the 
refugees, but they have declined the invitation."

The awful condition of 1.5 million Palestinians corralled in 360 sq. km, 
where they are deprived of basic human rights, is insufficient to prick 
the consciences of leading Western politicians. In the very least, the 
likes of Javier Solana or Tony Blair should demand respect for the 
freedom of movement of people. John Ging's blood seems almost to boil 
when relates that UNRWA has
10,000 employees and a budget of US$200 million for clinics, schools and 
housing. However, Israel will not even permit the agency to carry out 
its humanitarian mission, and they are not exempt from the effects of 
siege. He is a diplomat and can only present these facts while observing 
that Solana and Blair do not even answer his calls.

John Ging is an Irishman straightforward and clear in his arguments. He 
does not let any visitor leave without obtaining an accurate idea of 
what is going on in the Gaza Strip and above all why it is happening. 
"The issue is one of justice, not of distributing food parcels and 
medicines to people in need. Without a system by which Israel is held to 
account for its actions, justice does not exist."

Conclusion: Gaza is not just a prison and Israel is not its only guard

Listening to John Ging, one determines that the responsibility for the 
Palestinian humanitarian disaster does not just reside with Israel, but 
the international community certainly bears much responsibility.

What makes this situation more galling is that the Palestinians had 
sought to obtain a negotiated solution and democratic elections of its 
leadership - hoops Israel and the United States demanded that the 
Palestinians should jump through. The consequence of this unending 
situation is obviously a growing sense of despair and violence among its 
victims.

The terrible history of the Nazi concentration camps does not seem to 
deter Israel in creating a concentration camp of its own in Gaza. Now, 
with the blessing and the money of the "international community", the 
Erez crossing point has turned into the entrance to a concentration camp 
right now in the 21st Century. If blame, even if only moral blame, was 
cast on those who did nothing and looked the other way in times gone by, 
what judgment do the people deserve now who not only keep quiet about 
Israel's actions in Gaza, but actually aid and abet them?

It is a disgrace that in Europe and the United States, stalwart 
defenders of women's rights find space in the most influential 
newspapers and most watched television programmes to clamour against the 
use of the veil by Muslim women, but there is no clamour against the 
Israeli State for denying medical care in the Gaza strip, which means 
that hundreds of Gazans die due to medical neglect. Some women even have 
given birth right there in the control post, in the most shameful 
conditions, because they are not authorized to leave Gaza.

(1) The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD) announced on 
October 11th 2007 that the Israeli government had demolished 18,000 
Palestinian houses since the Occupation of the West Bank and Gaza began 
in 1967. It concludes, "Israeli policies are designed to limit the 
number of Palestinians living in areas earmarked for settlements or in 
their vicinity".

Amnesty International recalled on its web page of March 11th this year, 
"The Israeli authorities have for many years applied a discriminatory 
policy of house demolitions, permitting, on the one hand, many tens of 
Israeli settlements to be built on Occupied Palestinian territory in 
flagrant violation of international law at the same time as they 
confiscate Palestinian lands, forbidding the Palestinian population to 
build and destroying their houses. The cleared land is often used to 
build illegal Israeli settlements. International law prohibits occupying 
powers from building settlements for their own citizens on the 
territories they occupy."

(2) Thousands of Palestinians with horrible mutilations, unimaginable 
wounds, bodies burned and disabled for life give the lie to the Israeli 
government version. They wait to be called as witnesses by an eventual 
court briefed to try crimes against humanity committed in Palestine, 
Lebanon and other countries. That day, given the statistics of victims 
of Israeli attacks, there was no shortage of witnesses: 12,261 
Palestinians have been wounded by the Israeli Occupation army just from 
the start of the Al Aqsa Intifada of September 29th 2000 up until May 
2008. To get a total of the victims of Zionism, a figure very much 
higher, one would have to add the victims of the first Intifada and 
those from previous aggression in the form of actual attacks and wars.

The Palestine Centre for Human Rights, based in Gaza, offers abundant 
information about the long list of human rights violations by Israel in 
the Occupied Territories, including torture, arbitrary detention, 
destruction of Palestinian property, attacks on medical teams, 
extra-judicial executions, attacks on civilians not involved in 
hostilities and so on. See also data by B'Tselem, the Israeli 
Information Center for Human Rights, Defence for Children International 
- Israel Section, Machsom Watch - Women for Human Rights, Physicians for 
Human Rights - Israel, Rabbis for Human Rights, etc.

Any action by Israel has to be sold to the world as action to preserve 
the peace, defend the security of Israel, fight against terrorism, 
strengthen the peace process: Mass marketing know-how applied once again 
to selling another, different genocide.

"In his 1965 autobiography, Edward Bernays recalls a dinner at his home 
in 1933, 'where Karl von Weigand, foreign correspondent of the Hearst 
newspapers, an old hand at interpreting Europe and just returned from 
Germany, was telling us about Goebbels and his propaganda plans to 
consolidate Nazi power. Goebbels had shown Weigand his propaganda 
library, the best Weigand had ever seen. Goebbels, said Weigand, was 
using my book Crystallizing Public Opinion as a basis for his 
destructive campaign against the Jews of Germany. This shocked me. ... 
Obviously the attack on the Jews of Germany was no emotional outburst of 
the Nazis, but a deliberate, planned campaign.'"

Ending note: Agustin Velloso answers a doubt of the translator, TS. 
Simone Weil wrote that the Nazis applied in Europe what the Europeans 
routinely did in their colonies - genocide, torture, outright theft of 
land. After all this time, clearly, Zionist crimes against the 
Palestinians, against the Lebanese, knowingly and deliberately carry the 
weight not just of Nazi crimes but also those of the French in Algeria, 
of the Belgians in the Congo of the Dutch in Indonesia, of Portugal in 
Africa, of the British around the world, of the United States against 
its native peoples. It seems to me, the Israelis and their allies, the 
United States and the European Union, are deliberately applying the 
accumulated weight of that evil so as to destroy, if they have not done 
so already, the legitimacy of the United Nations system and related 
international law, and thus facilitate more easily criminal rich-country 
domination in the name of globalization. So I had a conceptual 
difficulty translating this article, related to the references to Nazism 
since, taken altogether in the current context, Israeli government 
policies, especially the defiance of the International Court of Justice 
and the threats of nuclear genocide against the people of Iran, amount 
to something worse than Nazism.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"bangla-vision" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bangla-vision?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to