Ziofascists in 1948...

*Abu Mazen: don't mess with the right of return *
[ 14/09/2008 - 11:51 PM ]
Palestinian refugees forced to flee their homes when Israel was 
established in 1948

By Khalid Amayreh

In recent days, the Chairman of the Palestinian Authority (PA) Mahmoud 
Abbas made two extremely worrying pronouncements  with regard to the 
paramount issue of the Right of Return.

Last week,  he  told Al-Arabiya TV that he couldn't demand that all 
Palestinian  refugees be allowed to return to their homes and towns from 
which they were uprooted when Israel was created in Palestine more than 
sixty years ago.

This week,  the PA President  uttered even more daring remarks in an 
interview with the Israeli newspaper, Ha'aretz, published Sunday, 14 
September.

He suggested that Israel was justified in refusing to allow the 
repatriation of the refugees.

"We understand that if we demand of you that all the five million 
refugees be allowed to return to Israel, the State of Israel would be 
destroyed. But we must talk about compromise and see what numbers you 
can accept," Abbas was quoted as saying.

He added: "We have to talk  with Israel about the number of refugees who 
will return to Israel. I am criticized for not demanding the return of 
all the five million refugees, but I say that we will demand the return 
of a reasonable number of refugees to Israel."

Needless to say, the loose tone of Abbas's words  seems to reflect  a 
certain propensity on  his part to effectively sacrifice and  
trivialize  the right of return, which more or less represents the heart 
and soul of the Palestinian problem.

Well, I have a few words of  advice for Abbas and his aides: Don't mess 
with the right of return. Don't play with fire.!

It is true that you were elected President of the PA in 2005. However, 
this doesn't give you the right to compromise on the core of  
Palestinian cause, the inalienable right of Palestinian refugees to 
return to their homes and villages from which they were ethnically 
cleansed and  subsequently dispersed to the four corners of the globe by 
organized Jewish terror.

Indeed, you yourself, Mr. Chairman, during your  election campaign four 
years ago, stressed repeatedly that the only solution acceptable to the 
Palestinians with regard to the refugee plight  would have to be based 
on UN resolution 194.

I am not asking you to emulate Saladin or Omar Ibn al Khattab This is 
obviously beyond your ability.

But the Palestinian masses do expect  you to  honour your undertaking 
and keep your word. This is certainly not beyond your ability.

Let me remind you  Mr. Chairman of paragraph #11 of  resolution- 194  in 
case you have forgotten it.

"It (the resolution)  resolves that the refugees wishing to return to 
their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted 
to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should 
be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss 
of  or damage to property which, under principles of international law 
or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities 
responsible."

Some of your friends and advisors may have advised you to "show 
flexibility" in this regard, and you may have harboured a certain 
tendency to view the right of return as somewhat anachronistic given the 
existing hard political realities.

/ "Why should I, a Jew from north London, be permitted to take up 
Israeli citizenship, when that right is denied to a Palestinian who 
languishes in a refugee camp in Lebanon? Especially when I acknowledge 
that a large majority of those that left in 1948 was ethnically cleansed 
by Israeli forces." *Alex Stein*, a British Jewish academic.
/-------------------------------

However, it is equally valid to argue that any resolution of the 
Palestinian-Israeli strife excluding a genuine implementation of the 
right of return would be disingenuous, fragile and short-lasting.

I am not indulging in sooth-saying or far-fetched prognostication. Ask 
the refugees themselves from Nahr al-Bared  in Lebanon to al-Wihdat in 
Jordan  to Jabalya in the Gaza Strip   and  al-Amaari near Ramallah, not 
far from your office. Ask them if they are willing to cede their right 
to return to their original   homes and villages even in return for a 
Palestinian state or quasi-state, and they will communicate to you their 
true feelings. Don't listen to the hangers-on around you whose main 
preoccupation is to make money and appear on TV screens every evening.

As a Palestinian, I was particularly disquieted by your remarks that 
"the return of five million Palestinians would lead to the destruction 
of Israel."

Well, Mr. Abbas. Has  Israel's survival as an exclusive Jewish state 
become a pressing Palestinian preoccupation?

As a Palestinian leader, your main preoccupation should be first and 
foremost  to protect and effect the right of return for these tormented 
Palestinians who have been suffering the agony of homelessness for more 
than sixty years.

Yes, sixty years of homelessness, pain and dispersion should be enough 
for these miserable people who had inherited misery and suffering 
generation after generation after generation.

Hence, ending this most obscene and sinister scandal would not be an act 
of charity to the Palestinians. It would  rather be a belated 
application of relevant UN resolutions which call for the repatriation 
and indemnification for these refugees.

The uprooting of these innocent victims of  satanic Zionism, now 
numbering five million human beings, was a collective act of rape and 
ethnic cleansing with very few parallels in history. It will remain an 
enduring act of rape as long as the wrongs done to the victims are not 
rectified and corrected.

Indeed, the bulk of the Zionist establishment doesn't even recognize the 
occurrence of these crimes, and whenever a conscientious Israeli 
academic speaks up against these wrongs, he or she is usually vilified 
and threatened by a society dominated by racism and hatred.

This is why the Right of Return, at least as far as Palestinians are 
concerned, shouldn't be a subject of dispute and controversy just as the 
rightful owner's right to recover his stolen property from a thief is 
not a subject of dispute and property.

As to Zionist arguments about the need for maintaining Israel as a 
Jewish state, it is obvious that such arguments constitute a brazen 
moral insult  to every human being that values justice and honesty.

First, it is well known that the term "Jewish character of Israel" is 
nothing short of a euphemism for the continuation of Israel's racist 
policies against non-Jews. Apartheid and racism can't be legitimate even 
if practitioners are Jewish. Jewish racism is no less virulent than 
German racism.

Second, it should be axiomatic to all  that the conscience of the world 
is under no more legal or moral obligation to maintain Zionism in 
Palestine than it was to maintain apartheid in South Africa.

More to the point, one is always prompted to ask the following question 
with regard to this issue: Does Israel's alleged right to religious and 
ethnic purity override the Palestinian refugees' right to return to 
their homes and country?

Finally, it is clear that denying the Palestinian refugees their 
inalienable right to return to Palestine/Israel is beyond the pale of  
simple rectitude.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the UN in 1948, 
states in its Article #13 that "everyone has the right to leave any 
country, including his own, and to return to his country."

To reiterate, the right of return is the heart and soul of the 
Palestinian problem. It is actually more paramount than the issue of 
Palestinian statehood and even Jerusalem, despite the latter's immense 
national and religious importance.

Hence, it should be amply clear that  any agreement or understanding 
between Israel and the PA  ignoring or overlooking this central issue of 
the right of return will be treated as null and void by the Palestinian 
people.

This is not only a message to the PLO leadership. It is also  a message 
to the insolent Israeli state which might be tempted to think  that the 
current weakness of the Palestinian position  vis-à-vis Israel would 
prompt the Palestinians to retreat from their national constants.





Linda
*http://freedetainees.org <http://freedetainees.org/>

*


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"bangla-vision" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bangla-vision?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to