http://www.opednews.com/articles/Conned-Again-by-Paul-Craig-Roberts-081109-377.html

If the change President-elect Obama has promised includes a halt to 
America's wars of aggression and an end to the rip-off of taxpayers by 
powerful financial interests, what explains Obama's choice of foreign 
and economic policy advisors?   Indeed, Obama's selection of Rahm Israel 
Emanuel as White House chief of staff is a signal that change ended with 
Obama's election.  The only thing different about the new administration 
will be the faces.

Rahm Israel Emanuel is a supporter of Bush's invasion of Iraq.  Emanuel 
rose to prominence in the Democratic Party as a result of his 
fundraising connections to AIPAC.  A strong supporter of the American 
Israeli Public Affairs Committee, he comes from a terrorist family.  His 
father was a member of Irgun, a Jewish terrorist organization that used 
violence to drive the British and Palestinians out of Palestine in order 
to create the Jewish state.  During the 1991 Gulf War, Rahm Israel 
Emanuel volunteered to serve in the Israel Defense Forces.  He was a 
member of the Freddie Mac board of directors and received $231,655 in 
directors fees in 2001.  According to Wikipedia, "during the time 
Emanuel spent on the board, Freddie Mac was plagued with scandals 
involving campaign contributions and accounting irregularities."

In "Hail to the Chief of Staff," Alexander Cockburn describes Emanuel as 
"a super-Likudnik hawk," who as chairman of the Democratic Congressional 
Campaign Committee in 2006 "made great efforts to knock out antiwar 
Democratic candidates."

My despondent friends in the Israeli peace movement ask, "What is this 
man doing in Obama's administration?"

Obama's election was necessary as the only means Americans had to hold 
the Republicans accountable for their crimes against the Constitution 
and human rights, for their violations of US and international laws, for 
their lies and deceptions, and for their financial chicanery.  As an 
editorial in /Pravda/ put it, "Only Satan would have been worse than the 
Bush regime. Therefore it could be argued that the new administration in 
the USA could never be worse than the one which divorced the hearts and 
minds of Americans from their brothers in the international community, 
which appalled the rest of the world with shock and awe tactics that 
included concentration camps, torture, mass murder and utter disrespect 
for international law."

But Obama's advisers are drawn from the same gang of Washington thugs 
and Wall Street banksters as Bush's.  Richard Holbrooke, son of Russian 
and German Jews, was an assistant secretary of state and ambassador in 
the Clinton administration. He implemented the policy to enlarge NATO 
and to place the military alliance on Russia's border in contravention 
of Reagan's promise to Gorbachev.  Holbrooke is also associated with the 
Clinton administration's illegal bombing of Serbia, a war crime that 
killed civilians and Chinese diplomats.  If not a neocon himself, 
Holbrooke is closely allied with them.

According to Wikipedia, Madeline Albright was born Marie Jana Korbelova 
in Prague to Jewish parents who had converted to Catholicism in order to 
escape persecution. She is the Clinton era secretary of state who told 
Leslie Stahl (60 Minutes) that the US policy of Iraq sanctions, which 
resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children, had 
goals important enough to justify the children's deaths. Albright's 
infamous words: "we think the price is worth it." Wikipedia reports that 
this immoralist served on the board of directors of the New York Stock 
Exchange at the time of Dick Grasso's $187.5 million compensation scandal.

Dennis Ross has long associations with the Israeli-Palestinian "peace 
negotiations."  A member of his Clinton era team, Aaron David Miller, 
wrote that during 1999-2000 the US negotiating team led by Ross acted as 
Israel's lawyer:  "we had to run everything by Israel first."  This 
"stripped our policy of the independence and flexibility required for 
serious peacemaking. If we couldn't put proposals on the table without 
checking with the Israelis first, and refused to push back when they 
said no, how effective could our mediation be?"  According to Wikipedia, 
Ross is "chairman of a new Jerusalem-based think tank, the Jewish People 
Policy Planning Institute, funded and founded by the Jewish Agency 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Agency>."

Clearly, this is not a group of advisors that is going to halt America's 
wars against Israel's enemies or force the Israeli government to accept 
the necessary conditions for a real peace in the Middle East.  

Ralph Nader predicted as much. In his "Open Letter to Barack Obama 
(November 3, 2008), Nader pointed out to Obama that his "transformation 
from an articulate defender of Palestinian rights . . . to a dittoman 
for the hard-line AIPAC lobby" puts Obama at odds with "a majority of 
Jewish-Americans" and "64% of Israelis."  Nader quotes the Israeli 
writer and peace advocate Uri Avnery's description of Obama's appearance 
before AIPAC as an appearance that "broke all records for obsequiousness 
and fawning."  Nader damns Obama for his "utter lack of political 
courage [for] surrendering to demands of the hard-liners to prohibit 
former president Jimmy Carter from speaking at the Democratic National 
Convention."  Carter, who achieved the only meaningful peace agreement 
between Israel and the Arabs, has been demonized by the powerful AIPAC 
lobby for criticizing Israel's policy of apartheid toward the 
Palestinians whose territory Israel forcibly occupies.

Obama's economic team is just as bad.  Its star is Robert Rubin, the 
bankster who was secretary of the treasury in the Clinton 
administration.  Rubin has responsibility for the repeal of the 
Glass-Steagall Act and, thereby, responsibility for the current 
financial crisis.  In his letter to Obama, Nader points out that Obama 
received unprecedented  campaign contributions from corporate and Wall 
Street interests.  "Never before has a Democratic nominee for President 
achieved this supremacy over his Republican counterpart."

Obama's victory speech was magnificent.  The TV cameras scanning faces 
in the audience showed the hope and belief that propelled Obama into the 
presidency.  But Obama cannot bring change to Washington.  There is no 
one in the Washington crowd that he can appoint who is capable of 
bringing change.  If Obama were to reach outside the usual crowd, anyone 
suspected of being a bringer of change could not get confirmed by the 
Senate.  Powerful interest groups--AIPAC, the military-security complex, 
Wall Street--use their political influence to block unacceptable 
appointments.

As Alexander Cockburn put it in his column, "Obama, the first-rate 
Republican," "never has the dead hand of the past had a 'reform' 
candidate so firmly by the windpipe."  Obama confirmed Cockburn's 
verdict in his first press conference as president-elect.  Disregarding 
the unanimous US National Intelligence Estimate, which concluded that 
Iran stopped working on nuclear weapons five years ago, and ignoring the 
continued certification by the International Atomic Energy Agency that 
none of the nuclear material for Iran's civilian nuclear reactor has 
been diverted to weapons use, Obama sallied forth with the Israel 
Lobby's propaganda and accused Iran of "development of a nuclear weapon" 
and vowing "to prevent that from happening." 
http://news.antiwar.com/2008/11/07/obama-hits-out-at-iran-closemouthed-on-tactics/
 

The change that is coming to America has nothing to do with Obama.  
Change is coming from the financial crisis brought on by Wall Street 
greed and irresponsibility, from the eroding role of the US dollar as 
reserve currency, from countless mortgage foreclosures, from the 
offshoring of millions of America's best jobs, from a deepening 
recession, from pillars of American manufacturing--Ford and GM--begging 
the government for taxpayers' money to stay alive, and from budget and 
trade deficits that are too large to be closed by normal means.

Traditionally, the government relies on monetary and fiscal policy to 
lift the economy out of recession.  But easy money is not working. 
Interest rates are already low and monetary growth is already high, yet 
unemployment is rising. The budget deficit is already huge--a world 
record--and the red ink is not stimulating the economy.  Can even lower 
interest rates and even higher budget deficits help an economy that has 
moved offshore, leaving behind jobless consumers overburdened with debt?

How much more can the government borrow?  America's foreign creditors 
are asking this question.  An official organ of the Chinese ruling party 
recently called for Asian and European countries to "banish the US 
dollar from their direct trade relations, relying only on their own 
currencies."  

"Why," asks another Chinese publication, "should China help the US to 
issue debt without end in the belief that the national credit of the US 
can expand without limit?"

The world has tired of American hegemony and had its fill of American 
arrogance. America's reputation is in tatters: the financial debacle, 
endless red ink, Abu Ghraib, Gitmo, rendition, torture, illegal wars 
based on lies and deception, disrespect for the sovereignty of other 
countries, war crimes, disregard for international law and the Geneva 
Conventions, the assault on habeas corpus and the separation of powers, 
a domestic police state, constant interference in the internal affairs 
of other countries, boundless hypocrisy.   

The change that is coming is the end of American empire.  The hegemon 
has run out of money and influence.  Obama as "America's First Black 
President" will lift hopes and, thus, allow the act to be carried on a 
little longer.  But the New American Century is already over.

 

Paul Craig Roberts, a former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and 
former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, has held numerous 
academic appointments. He has been reporting shocking cases of 
prosecutorial abuse for two decades. A new edition of his book, The 
Tyranny of Good Intentions, co-authored with Lawrence Stratton, a 
documented account of how Americans lost the protection of law, was 
published by Random House in March, 2008.


-- 

Linda
*http://freedetainees.org <http://freedetainees.org/>

*


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"bangla-vision" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bangla-vision?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to