ZetaTalk: Moon Landing
Note: written on May 15, 2002
A hot topic on the Internet and among conspiracy buffs is whether
man ever indeed landed on the Moon, or all the evidence provided to
mankind is faked. As evidence of a fake is apparent wind blowing a
flag, dust raised by landing feet blowing about as though air were
present to move it, shadows inappropriate for the Moon, and other
evidence of atmosphere or staging. Did man go to the Moon? Absolutely.
Were dramatizations done in film theaters? Absolutely. both
occurred, and here's why.
As is often reported, the early Moon landings involved startled
astronauts making statements on live feed about "we were not the first"
and the like. Likewise, live video feed showed trash on the Moon giving
evidence that activity had occurred in the past, and perhaps the recent
past. Evidence of awareness of the alien presence, or other information
not given to the general public, can often be discerned from
what is not said as much as what is said. Why the 3 month
delay in reporting, by different media organizations, if
approval to report was not a part of the process? Likewise, the
astronauts were on a need-to-know basis, as they were expected to be
mobbed if they succeeded and went on the lecture tour, often
interviewed and the like, and slips were to be avoided by telling them
as little as possible. Thus, they were genuinely startled by what they
found on the Moon, and their handlers in Houston were unaware of the
degree of evidence they would in fact find on the Moon. Oops!
What to do? Lets just film some new footage, and release that,
instead.
NASA was aware that there were alien enclaves on the dark side of the
Moon, but unaware of the trash on the visible side. During early
genetic engineering projects, the engineers often used the Moon as a
lab, fearing and wishing to avoid the large carnivores on Earth. During
these genetic engineering episodes, they would scarcely be hiding on
the dark side of the Moon! Why hide? The aliens talking to NASA going
into the Apollo missions were Service-to-Self, part of Alternative 2,
to set up camps off Earth as a survival means during the
coming pole shift. They were on the dark side as Service-to-Self aliens
do not do density shifting well, ala the movie The Fly, and
their masters do not allow their minions to shift during missions, for
this reason. Thus, they are in 3rd Density, highly visible from Earth
should they not be on the dark side of the Moon. NASA
expected this, but discussion on past genetic engineering projects,
which were not done by the Service-to-Self, never came up!
The astronauts were read the riot act when they returned, having
blabbered their first impressions on the Moon. It has been obvious to
those looking at the pattern that prior to this live feeds
were the norm, and after delayed and only partial release of
video and audio was allowed. When a heavy job of intimidation is done,
with death threats and worse than death threats, it takes a lot to
release this. Beat a dog each hour, viciously, for months, and then try
to tell it that was all in the past. The dog has lost trust, cowers,
growls, avoids, and will likely never trust humans again most
certainly if not in the same company. NASA has not changed hands, is
still the same agency, infiltrated by CIA, and thus the astronauts, as
their beaten dogs, are loath to trust.
Note: Below added during Nov 16, 2002
Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.
NASA of late has been dealing with its many failures, its
inability to get a space station operational in time to stage escape to
Mars, and the months upon months of delays getting any shuttles up at
all. Wanting to be a player, perhaps be viewed as important by the
elite with money and bunkers and guns, they hope to be influential in
the public eye. They have for years denied the public direct Hubble
images, been caught endlessly air brushing out UFO's, and are suspected
all around the world of a conspiracy regarding the Moon landing itself.
Well of course they went to the Moon, and landed, but they also
filmed footage on Earth to fill in, as they could not trust their own
men to avoid blurting out the truth. Now, covered with the lint of
decades of lies and deception, and the increasing pool of specific
information on just when and how they have lied,
they come forth declaring themselves clean. Why did they announced new
information regarding the Moon
Landing, and then withdraw? There was a final rehearsal, and all
the many glitches that would only inflame the conspiracy
theorists were discovered. This pig is too dirty to ever
clean up, and the less they say, the better, was the decision.
http://www.zetatalk.com/govmt/g146.htm
--- In [email protected], Linda Ghaliyaa Richard
<taliba.qu...@...> wrote:
>
> Okay Greg - THAT was a good one!! I also wonder why they would
have
> faked the accident with Apollo 13. As well as other failed
missions.
> At least in 13 they got them home safely. Apollo 1 was not so
lucky -
> and Gus Grissom, Ed White and Roger Chaffee were all killed. I
doubt
> that was faked. I also doubt they were 'sacrificed' for some
conspiracy
> cause. By the way, they're planning to go back to the moon with a
new
> program. So I guess we'll all find out then. But then people may
claim
> that's a fake too. ;-)
http://news.cnet.com/8301-19514_3-10236147-239.html
>
> Again - the money that is going to the space program would not be
routed
> to help the poor, unfortunately. What it would probably go for is
the
> military budget.
>
