On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Anand Chitipothu<anandol...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The zip solution is succinct. >> >> Also, by the virtue of being a built-in function zip() should be >> faster than the second approach. > > Complexity of first solution is O(n)
> values, items = list(zip(*sorted(zip(values,items), reverse=True))) Must be O(n lg n) .. due to the use of 'sorted(...)' _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers