On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Navin Kabra <navin.ka...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Gopinath R <gopiindia...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I am a newbie to python. i like to learn python strongly. which version is
>> recommended to start with 2.6 or 3.0. I believe 3.0 has lot more features
>> added, there is no backward compatibility in that. we cannot use some of the
>> 2.6 syntaxes in that. for Example: raw_input. it worries me a lot. pls give
>> some suggestion.
>>
>
> I think one of the important features of python is the availability of a
> huge set of external libraries that make your programming easier (because
> you can reuse stuff, and not reinvent the wheel). This is true of python
> 2.6, but not yet true of python 3.x. So, assuming that you would like to
> make something useful with python (as opposed to toy programs), go with 2.6.
>
>



> I can't think of a strong reason for
>


Sorry. This should have been "I can't think of a strong reason for learning
3.x at this point of time"
_______________________________________________
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers

Reply via email to