On Tue, Oct 05 2010, Umar Shah wrote: [...]
>> thanks for the quick stats, although i prefer in for the type >> compatibility > now i have 1 more reason in favour of using in :) [...] People talk about Pythonicity and one of the ways to quantify it is to say that "something is Pythonic if the more experienced Pythonistas use it". The features that are used by the old timers are likely to be optimised more than the others. Because of this, timeit is a good rule of thumb to figure out whether something is pythonic or not. -- _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers