On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Senthil Kumaran <orsent...@gmail.com> wrote: [...] > I have heard positively of ImageMagick's python wrapper for doing > Image Processing where PIL is not sufficient. For most of my simple > needs PIL was enough. If ImageMagick has what you are looking for, I > think you should safely go for it. It well maintained when compared to > PIL and sure it has wealth options too [...]
Thanks, ImageMagick is probably what we are going to go with. Regards, Gora _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
