On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Pratap Chakravarthy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> *Really?* I believe that the ball is currently in your court.
>> It was *your* regex that was broken, and badly, if I may
>> add.
>
> By saying broken, do you mean that this regex
>   r'Searching for OPUSH on([^\.\n\r]+)|Channel:([^\r\n]*)'
> follows the pathological case of exponential complexity ?
[...]

No, it doesn't: The exponential complexity was a general
crib, based on your statement.

Again, please do not take it personally, but the above is
just *broken* and does not even try, IMHO. For someone
who claims to be an advocate for regexs, this is "not even
wong": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong

A MAC address is pretty well-specified, but you do not
even try, when at least the OP did. Again, forgive me,
but this smells of intellectual laziness to me.

Regards,
Gora
_______________________________________________
BangPypers mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers

Reply via email to