On 09:50 Fri 28 Sep , Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 04:28:21AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > wrote: > > HI, > > > > The patch is next > > net/eth: fix link handling > > > > was NEVER send to the ML > > > > IIRC I was the author of the first version and this disapear > > > > Uwe and I just get this discussion on the kernel ML about patch update > > > > I was basically pissed off because I got the strong feeling that I spent > more time reviewing and testing the patch than you initially spent > writing it in the first place. The second version still stored apples > in edev->phydev->link and bananas in edev->carrier, but still did a > edev->carrier = dev->link. I did this on purpose as I do want to store the link and later export it via env as I get a patch here for 2 wifi driver where I'll not use the phylib
so store the carrier is the correct way we could use a net_carrier(xx) as in the kernel to update the field but I do need the carrier to not be manage only for the phylib my work on thiose wifi driver is not finished but on the way maybe next release > > Sorry for not posting it on the ML, doing that now. I was pissed off that this is based on my work and I lost the author of the patch and no mention about my work Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
