On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 09:38:56 +0200
Sascha Hauer <s.ha...@pengutronix.de> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 10:35:31PM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> > +static int ath79_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> > +{
> > +   struct spi_master *master = spi->master;
> > +   struct device_d spi_dev = spi->dev;
> > +
> > +   if (spi->bits_per_word != 8) {
> > +           dev_err(master->dev, "master doesn't support %d bits per word 
> > requested by %s\n",
> > +                   spi->bits_per_word, spi_dev.name);
> > +           return -1;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   if ((spi->mode & (SPI_CPHA | SPI_CPOL)) != SPI_MODE_0) {
> > +           dev_err(master->dev, "master doesn't support SPI_MODE%d 
> > requested by %s\n",
> > +                   spi->mode & (SPI_CPHA | SPI_CPOL), spi_dev.name);
> > +           return -1;
> > +   }
> 
> Better -EINVAL?
> 
> Otherwise this series looks good.
>
 
Sure!

I'll resend the series.
 
-- 
Best regards,
  Antony Pavlov

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Reply via email to