----- Mail original ----- De: "Sascha Hauer" <s.ha...@pengutronix.de> À: "Robert Jarzmik" <robert.jarz...@free.fr> Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Envoyé: Jeudi 29 Janvier 2015 10:47:20 Objet: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors
> Yeah I know, connecting the 91c111 inspired the board designers to many > funny things. Passing function pointers in platform_data is not very > future proof since this doesn't work with device tree. I see that the > Linux driver has device tree support. Does this binding work for you? Well, it can't, because lubbock doesn't support device-tree yet, it's on my todo list for the kernel (and barebox of course). That means there is no way to even build a device-tree enabled kernel for lubbock ... yet. Now the binding would work with : - the address shift being declared (as in kernel driver) - a set of 16 bit accessors being declared in barebox's smcs9111.c driver (and not in platform specific accessors) Would you rather have me change the approach with a new set of accessor in smcs9111.c, and the shift as a parameter (both platform_data and device- tree) ? Cheers. -- Robert _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
