On Mo, 2015-03-16 at 12:33 +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > I do not like and do not want to use the FTD format to store the key > but x509.
Yes, I think we are in agreement that we need to support both key formats. > Image format need to be 100% seperated from key format. Of course. > That's why I work on a framework so we do not care of both. > > Multiple image format with multiple image of key format. Could you explain your image format in a bit more detail? How your intend to defend against a mix-and-match attack? Regards, Jan -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
