Hey Sascha, This v2 series of patches includes just changes in the commit messages, trying to explain which of the patches apply to barebox and/or the barebox<->bbremote interactions. I did test all these patches also with RATP FS, and I didn't see any regression.
I did see issues in RATP FS happening with and without my patches, though. E.g. "cat"-ing a long file (>1024 bytes) that is being exported via RATFS results in each byte read being sent through the ratp output console messages one by one (the actual read operation over RATFS goes in chunks of 255, but the cat stdout messages via RATP go byte by byte...). After that, the additional read operations above offset 1024 end up timing out. I believe I'm going to have to work with RATFS in the near future, so I'll likely spend some time looking at those issues soon anyway. Aleksander Morgado (16): ratp: add missing transition to SYN-RECEIVED in behavior B ratp: avoid unnecessary variable initializations ratp: send missing RST in behavior C2 ratp: add missing RST flag in behavior G ratp: completely ignore RST flagged packets in behavior G ratp: fix data presence check ratp: fix single byte sending flagged with SO ratp: remove bogus data checks in behavior C2 ratp: remove FIXME comment: FIN always requires ACK ratp: fix sending ACKs without data ratp: consolidate ratp_sn_expected() and ratp_an_expected() ratp: prefer using ratp_send_ack() in behaviour I1 ratp: send initial data in behaviour B if any pending ratp: don't ignore data that may arrive in behaviour H1 ratp: consolidate setting the next AN or SN flags ratp: user close may happen in SYN-RECEIVED state lib/ratp.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- scripts/remote/ratp.py | 38 +++++++--------- 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) -- 2.13.1 _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
