On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 08:39:20AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> For legacy reasons, we do not fail the MCI registration when a regulator
> can't be immediately requested, but we at least print a warning when
> this happens. Add a comment guiding the user into how to resolve the
> warning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/mci/mci-core.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

Applied, thanks

Sascha

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mci/mci-core.c b/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> index b8f71e15986e..8c08a4f61f63 100644
> --- a/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> @@ -1941,6 +1941,16 @@ int mci_register(struct mci_host *host)
>  
>       host->supply = regulator_get(hw_dev, "vmmc");
>       if (IS_ERR(host->supply)) {
> +             /*
> +              * If you know your regulator to be always online on boot, but
> +              * can't easily add a barebox driver for it, you may use
> +              * barebox,allow-dummy-supply in your board's regulator device
> +              * tree node to side step this warning.
> +              *
> +              * If you run into this warning, because your regulator driver
> +              * hasn't probed the device yet, consider enabling deep probe
> +              * for your board, to probe dependencies on demand.
> +              */
>               dev_warn(hw_dev, "Failed to get 'vmmc' regulator (ignored).\n");
>               host->supply = NULL;
>       }
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Reply via email to