Hi Ahmad, On 23-02-21, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > We have some instances of device_d and driver_d still lingering in > documentation and commented out code. Let's drop these as well. > > Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <[email protected]> > --- > Documentation/devel/porting.rst | 2 +- > drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c | 2 +- > drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h | 2 +- > fs/cramfs/cramfs.c | 2 +- > include/linux/mfd/core.h | 2 +- > include/platform_data/eth-smc911x.h | 2 +- > include/platform_data/serial-ns16550.h | 2 +- > 7 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devel/porting.rst b/Documentation/devel/porting.rst > index 8af0456ab2d5..619c5e49e00f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devel/porting.rst > +++ b/Documentation/devel/porting.rst > @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ tree binding, you can write a driver that matches against > your board's > { /* sentinel */ }, > }; > > - static struct driver_d my_board_driver = { > + static struct driver my_board_driver = { > .name = "board-mine", > .probe = my_board_probe, > .of_compatible = my_board_of_match, > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c > b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c > index e8e690311148..c7252ce72a27 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ > * A typical device registration is as follows: > * > * @code > - * static struct device_d my_nand_device = { > + * static struct device my_nand_device = { > * .name = "gpmc_nand", > * .id = some identifier you need to show.. e.g. "gpmc_nand0" > * .resource[0].start = GPMC base address > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h > index a0467ff3c465..c9a0a8eed662 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h > @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ struct musb { > u16 int_rx; > u16 int_tx; > > - //struct device_d *phydev; > + //struct device *phydev;
IMHO this line can be removed completely. Regards, Marco
