On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 12:16:46PM +0200, Gerald Loacker wrote:
> The i2c bus gets disabled without sending a stop condition. This violates
> i2c timing on the clock line. Fix this and include all related functions
> (rk_i2c_send_start_bit, rk_i2c_send_stop_bit, rk_i2c_disable) onto the same
> level.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gerald Loacker <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rockchip.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> @@ -387,6 +376,11 @@ static int rockchip_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter 
> *adapter, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
>               struct i2c_msg *msg = &msgs[i];
>  
>               dev_dbg(dev, "i2c_xfer: chip=0x%x, len=0x%x\n", msg->addr, 
> msg->len);
> +
> +             ret = rk_i2c_send_start_bit(i2c);
> +             if (ret)
> +                     break;
> +
>               if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) {
>                       ret = rk_i2c_read(i2c, msg->addr, 0, 0, msg->buf,
>                                         msg->len);
> @@ -394,6 +388,9 @@ static int rockchip_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, 
> struct i2c_msg *msgs,
>                       ret = rk_i2c_write(i2c, msg->addr, 0, 0, msg->buf,
>                                          msg->len);
>               }
> +
> +             rk_i2c_send_stop_bit(i2c);
> +
>               if (ret) {
>                       dev_dbg(dev, "i2c_write: error sending: %pe\n",
>                               ERR_PTR(ret));
> @@ -402,9 +399,7 @@ static int rockchip_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, 
> struct i2c_msg *msgs,
>               }
>       }
>  
> -     rk_i2c_send_stop_bit(i2c);

I believe this is wrong. A stop bit should only be sent after the last
message, not after all messages.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Reply via email to