On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 07:55:35AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> On 25.09.24 16:06, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > spidelay() currently only is a no-op dummy function. Actually delay in
> > this function to avoid spi-gpio being faster than specified.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.ha...@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/spi/gpio_spi.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/gpio_spi.c b/drivers/spi/gpio_spi.c
> > index e5664df3fe..a71b4eddab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/gpio_spi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/gpio_spi.c
> > @@ -48,7 +48,10 @@ static inline int getmiso(const struct spi_device *spi)
> > return !!gpio_get_value(priv->data->miso);
> > }
> >
> > -#define spidelay(nsecs) do { } while (0)
> > +static inline void spidelay(unsigned int nsecs)
> > +{
> > + udelay(max(1U, nsecs / 1000));
>
> Why delay 1us at least? Why not use ndelay?
I was under the assumption that we don't have ndelay(). We do have it,
will use it instead.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
