On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 02:20:59AM -0400, anis chali wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > Please keep the list on Cc. Other people might be interested as well and > > might have some opinion in the discussions taking place. > Sorry for that of course. > > I just looked around how fit_has_image() is used. The return value is > > treated as bool by all callers, so I think it's better to just return > > bool from the function. I just sent a patch for it... > ack > > Sorry, I don't understand the question. > I was asking, would 128KB be always enough to cover any hardware, should > we go for 512KB instead?
When I understand correctly the 128KiB would only be the additional memory for later additions to the device tree, right? I think for that 128KiB should be quite much already. > For now I submitted with 128KB. > > No. I don't do EFI very much and I currently don't have a setup for > > testing this. Ahmad is more experienced with EFI than me. > Ok, I can maybe share my scripts, they are not clean at all with many > repos. if I have time > I will do some clean up and share them (there scripts to generate > fitImage, linux, dts, optee, TF-A, UKI, edk2, custom qemu ...). > Thanks. Great, looking forward to it. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
