On Friday, November 7, 2014 5:57:31 PM UTC+3, [email protected] wrote: > Zitat von Stanislav German-Evtushenko <[email protected]>: > > > Does it make sense to talk about concurrency when it is accessed by > > the only process (bareos on our case) ? > > > > To my knowledge you have one db connection per running job and some > more for example per bconsole and the like, so yes concurrency could > also be a point to take care of. > > But as always YMMV > > Regards > > Andreas
At the same time when you have the only single tape drive (means no concurrent jobs) and backups are only performed at non-working time it doesn't seem be a big issue for me. However documentation doesn't say "you can use sqlite3 in some cases", instead it says "only for testing". So I wonder if there are some serious issues with bareos/sqlite3 that we should know about. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bareos-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
