Dear Collected Wisdom,
   It struck me this week that I really don't know when the
   thirteen-course "rider" lute developed.  We know from Weiss's
   correspondence that he developed the swan-neck lute c.1719-20, but what
   do we know about its rider cousin?  I have to now uncritically assumed
   that the rider lute came before the swan neck, presumably thinking so
   because it is visually closer to a conventional eleven course, and we
   tend to assume today an "evolutionary" paradigm that explains the lute
   as gradually becoming bigger over time
   (6c-7c-8c-9c-10c-11c-12c-13c...)  I realise this paradigm is by no
   means historical or even accurate - it does not account for the huge
   renaissance bass lutes such as Hartung's instrument in C in Nuernberg,
   or some smaller baroque lutes that one finds in various collections -
   and yet it persists.
   But perhaps the rider lute may be a later development than the swan
   neck when seen from the point of view of string technology:  perhaps
   the extended neck was needed in order to accommodate the lower
   tessitura of the 12th and 13th courses before the introduction (and
   more importantly, the acceptance among players) of wound strings
   (initially developed in the 1670's, they seem to have taken a long time
   to catch on) that permitted the same pitches to be played at the
   shorter string length of the rider model.  So, did the development go
   11c -> swan neck -> rider lute, or 11c -> rider lute -> swan neck?
   I realise that this is in a sense a bogus question, both because the
   11c never went out of fashion, and because the rider lute and swan neck
   model coexisted (i.e., one did not cancel out the other:  for example,
   we know that Weiss had both, since he at once developed the swan neck
   all while writing pieces that occasionally demand the stopped 9th and
   10th courses necessitating a rider model.)  That said, the chronology
   of the rider lute's development is something we could know about.
   When are the first pieces that use 13 courses anyway?  I presume around
   1700-1715?  Do these early pieces indicate anything regarding lute
   type?
   Anything anyone on this list may have to say about this subject would
   be much appreciated!
   As ever,
   Benjamin
   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to