Thanks, Bernd. That could be it. Or not. My wife writes dictionaries for a 
living, and knows a lot about the D'Alembert-Diderot encyclopedia, so we were 
wondering about this piece by DuBut. Perhaps there is no connection at all. 

Rob

www.robmackillop.net 

> On 21 May 2014, at 19:32, Bernd Haegemann <b...@symbol4.de> wrote:
> 
> It could perhaps refer to this book:
> 
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_grand_dictionaire_historique
> 
> Or may be the piece itself was estimated as highly learned?
> 
> B
> 
>> On 21.05.2014 19:45, Rob MacKillop wrote:
>> Any background info regarding the piece on page 145 of the Saizenay 
>> manuscript, entitled "L'enciclopedie Allemande de Du But"? I'm wondering 
>> which encyclopedia might be being referred to.
>> My basic search with Google failed to bring up a French encyclopedia before 
>> D'Alembert. The closest I can find is a popular science book which became 
>> very popular in France, mid century: Pseudodoxia Epidemica by Thomas Browne, 
>> first published in English, and which refers to itself as an encyclopedia. 
>> But that might be way off target.
>> 
>> Any ideas?
>> 
>> Rob
>> 
>> www.robmackillop.net
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> To get on or off this list see list information at
>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 


Reply via email to