Presumably FB was talking of dark diapasons and not bass courses diapasons with their octaves? Modern wire wounds are very bright and there is little need for strong octaves. Personally when using Venice gut loaded that were quite flexible and dark, I moved to higher tension Venice octaves to compensate the slightly flappy quality of loaded basses (which at first had tended to rattle slightly). This works very well, the bass initially gives way to the thumb pressure, but the higher tension octave gives a delayed resistance (all tendency to rattle disappeared). I preferred this to going to a thicker higher tension loaded bass which could sometimes sound slightly over damped. I have kept these octaves with the new synthetic basses, and the few lutenists who have tried my lute found it sounded well with this configuration (how well this corresponds to evidence of historic stringing, I am not sure. Although where indicated that octaves should be played without basses, my octaves have a good tuneful presence, which I doubt would be the case with lower tension ones; but along with FB some might argue 'basses should be basses', whereas mine have a slightly singing Meanes presence to them).
In the past, I have used first generation stiff HT loaded gut and second generation flexible Venice loaded gut and now the flexible synthetic ones, and after a time and some tweaking, managed with each type. I think the playing style alters somewhat to adapt to stringing and tensions, but I can imagine that those used to very stiff wirewounds might take some time to adapt. On the other hand, if a flexible bass is false, no increased tension of the octave will prevent it from rattling. Regards Anthony Le jeudi, février 2, 2017, 10:53 AM, Mimmo Peruffo <mperu...@aquilacorde.com> a écrit : The Well, Tony Bailes mailed me that: Writing in 1629 Francis Bacon stresses that low strings should produce a bass sound: "for we see, that in one of the lower strings of a lute, there When soundeth not the sound of the treble, nor any mixt sound , but onely the sound of the base." Mimmo ps: I can made them less stretchly using a different elastomer. the problem is that they became a bit darker in the sound. Any suggestion? I am ready to start with the big batch. I am a bit worry about those that like that they are in some way still close to the wound strings -----Messaggio originale----- From: Martin Shepherd Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 10:26 AM To: Mimmo ; Matthew Daillie Cc: [1]baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Baroque Lute Stringing Dear All, If we're really interested in how lutes might have been strung historically, I think it's important to take the historical evidence (very little of it, I know) as a starting point, rather than the habits of modern players using modern strings. We have a lot of iconographic evidence (plus the evidence from measuring bridge holes) that bass strings were rather thin - so the conclusion that they were more dense than a plain gut string seems pretty well inescapable. Having said that, the tensions which modern players expect may be too high, for several reasons. One is that we are accustomed to wound strings, which are very flexible and don't work at all well if they are at too low a tension. A related problem is that modern players tend to play much further from the bridge than their historical counterparts. Another issue is that we have tended to assume roughly equal tension across all the strings, so we have not experimented much with a tapering of tension as we go down into the bass. One interesting aspect of the iconography is that strings get progressively thicker as they go down into the bass, but not as much as one would expect if the tensions were equal. To make this concrete, for a descent of an octave (maintaining equal tension) the string should double in diameter, so the 6th course on a 6c lute should be nearly twice the diameter of the 4th. On the subject of string diameters, Mimmo estimates the thinnest string which could have been made in the past as .42-.44mm. Single top strings will need to be a higher tension than the individual strings of a course, but even so it is more or less inevitable that the tension must be tapered to some degree, otherwise bass strings (and tension) would be enormous. Mimmo has recently written that equal tension is different from equal "feel", and I agree with his suggestion that (in order to maintain equal feel) thinner strings should therefore be at a higher tension than thicker ones. I have done this as a matter of instinct for many years - using a higher tension on the second course than on the third, for example. As an aside, I note that most of us have tended to use octaves at a lower tension than the fundamentals, but the string table in the Gaultier book (discovered by Andreas Schlegel), and my more recent experiments, suggest perhaps a more equal tension. As far as the characteristics of the strings is concerned, there are some apparent contradictions in the historical evidence. Many paintings give the impression that the strings were very floppy (compared to modern gut strings), with lengths of spare string dangling from the pegbox. On the other hand, one of the tests for a good string recommended by Dowland is "stiffness to the finger" (assessed before putting the string on the lute by pressing the end of the string to see how bendy it is). In terms of elasticity, Mace talks about a string stretching "an inch or two" in the winding up - suggesting a string much more elastic than almost any modern string. Then we come to another apparent contradiction on the area of modern experiments. I have found the Savarez KF strings (made from PVDF, much more dense then gut, so perhaps more like a "loaded" gut string as far as density is concerned) work very well, in spite of being very stiff and not very elastic. They also work well at lower tensions than other types of string. They are usually pretty true, and that helps. The implication seems to be that a string which is sufficiently dense (and can therefore be thin) doesn't need to be very elastic in order to work. I don't know how to reconcile this with the historical evidence, but it occurs to me that there is a difference between elasticity (stretchiness) and "sideways flexibility" or "floppy flexibility" (which it seems the old strings may have had). Think of the difference between an rubber band and a piece of household string - the cotton string is very floppy but has very little elasticity. All things considered I would definitely be interested to see Mimmo make a string with lower elasticity. Trueness is paramount - if a string is even slightly false the irregular pattern of vibration will make it rattle against the frets and it will never sound well even as an open string. Just a few thoughts for you to chew on.... Martin On 02/02/2017 07:20, Mimmo wrote: > Well, I can add a few informations > There are no production problems it shelf. I had an extruder broken so I > was obliged to wait the time to fix it. After that I finished the raw > material. I received it a week ago. > They has more amplitude in the vibration whose problem is mostly because > one should compensate the lack of tension when the strings are under > tension. In practice they became thinner that any wound strings. In short, > if the equivalent gut by calculation is 145 I raccomand to install a 150 > instead. So under tension the final gauge will be the suitable one. > Yes, there is no problem to switch to a more stiffer plastic blend. The > problem is that we lost a bit of brightness. Is it a good idea ? I do not > know, people has the wound strings sound in comparation. > Take care > Mimmo Peruffo > >> Il giorno 01 feb 2017, alle ore 23:34, Matthew Daillie >> <[2]dail...@club-internet.fr> ha scritto: >> >> Of the main copper-wound strings available, the fullest sounding and >> brightest are the Kürschner followed by the Savarez, then the Aquila Ds >> and lastly the Aquila DEs, which are pretty dull (and are no longer being >> made although several retailers still have quite large stocks available). >> >> As far as I am concerned the jury is still out on the Aquila loaded >> nylgut. Many of us have high hopes but there are production problems >> (there has only been one batch so far and many diameters are unavailable) >> and some strings can have considerably sideways amplitude when plucked >> (even causing them to catch neighbouring strings!) as well as intonation >> issues (but that is also true of a lot of wound strings). >> >> Best, >> >> Matthew >> >>> On 01/02/2017 22:25, David Rastall wrote: >>> It seems I am back playing Baroque lute once again, after rather a long >>> hiatus. It's been long enough that I have forgotten some of the points >>> of conventional wisdom concerning stringing. I'm playing an 11c lute >>> currently strung with silver-wound basses and Pyramid nylon mids and >>> trebles. I'm not so much bothered by the sustain of the nylon strings, >>> but if you folks can refresh my memory: what is the best choice of >>> basses to get a sustain which is not downright thunky or chunky, but has >>> shorter sustain than the silver-wounds? >>> >>> David R >>> >> >> >> To get on or off this list see list information at >> [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. [4]https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- References 1. javascript:return 2. javascript:return 3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html 4. https://www.avast.com/antivirus