I am noticing blatant spam getting through that is coming from hosts listed in certain RBL's, should i be adding more RBL lists into exim.conf to remedy this ?
Is there any harm in letting SA or MailScanner handle RBL's so that false positives are stored and able to release to end users ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Colin Kissa" <[email protected]> To: "Baruwa users list" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:39:00 PM Subject: Re: [Baruwa] Puppet install & SA/MS config On 29 Mar 2012, at 9:25 PM, Shawn Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > I have noticed that there are no RBL checks being done on my test server, > which is Centos 5.2 and installed by Puppet toaster. the rbl checks are being done by exim at smtp time, there is no point in processing messages from folks who are on an rbl > > Am i correct in saying that the Puppet Setup does not enable RBL checks in > SA or MailScanner ? the rbls in sa do not need enabling, the puppet install enables spamcop checks in mail scanner as there are too harsh to use at smtp time > Does it make a diferece to Baruwa, if RBL checks are done by MailScanner or > SA? > In MailScanner.conf i noticed that the MTA = sendmail, however the Puppet > installed Exim, is that correct? that is because baruwa overides the default options in mailscanner.conf using baruwa.conf > > Shawn > > -- > View this message in context: > http://baruwa-users-list.963389.n3.nabble.com/Puppet-install-SA-MS-config-tp3868781p3868781.html > > Sent from the Baruwa users list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Keep Baruwa FREE - http://pledgie.com/campaigns/12056 _______________________________________________ Keep Baruwa FREE - http://pledgie.com/campaigns/12056 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by IT4 MailShield, and is believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________ Keep Baruwa FREE - http://pledgie.com/campaigns/12056
