Yikes, those are expensive options.
As far as the "cluster" options, I didnt really mean to ask if it as
possible, but more "how to do it". I would assume that a majority of
admins that use puppet to roll this type of solution out, would be using
it to roll out additional members of a cluster. Also, while I have your
attention, what is the recommended cluster setup for multiple
distributed nodes? I dont need load balancing per say, but I do want to
make sure that if a node does go down, everything is back in sync when
it comes back online.
Thanks for your time and effort on the best anti spam frontend
available today.
On 2012-06-08 05:01, Andrew Colin Kissa wrote:
On 08 Jun 2012, at 11:40 AM, Mark Chaney wrote:
Thanks for the puppet config for baruwa. Its pretty slick, but i do
have a few questions.
1) Is there any way to use postfix instead of exim? Not a big deal,
but when it comes to an anti-spam gateway, im more familiar with
postfix.
Of course, you can modify it to use postfix, you will have write the
manifests and the templates.
2) Is there any way to easily create slaves for baruwa? Im up for
either doing a master/master or just doing a master with the gui, but
all the processing happening on two slaves.
You can modify the tooster to do that,
3) What version of baruwa is installed when using the puppet config?
The tooster uses the repo so its the latest version in the repo.
4) Not at all related, but is there any places where I could
purchase a spamassassin subscription for rules updates, etc?
To beef up your spamassassin get cloudmark[1], spamhaus feed[2] surbl
feed[3]
[1]
http://www.cloudmark.com/en/products/cloudmark-authority-spamassassin/index
[2] http://www.mxtools.com/Products/Spamhaus.aspx
[3] http://www.mxtools.com/Products/SURBL.aspx
--
www.baruwa.org
_______________________________________________
Keep Baruwa FREE - http://pledgie.com/campaigns/12056
_______________________________________________
Keep Baruwa FREE - http://pledgie.com/campaigns/12056
