Nicklas Nordborg wrote:
> Pawel Sztromwasser wrote:
>> Totally agree. That makes it much more flexible. Please, feel free to
>> change the code.
>
>
> I have now implemented this feature in the trunk. There are several
> possibilities to specify which 'ServiceFactory' to use. The easiest
> is to use something like this when the application starts up:
>
> Options opt = new Options();
> opt.setProperty(HTTPConstants.CHUNKED, false);
> ServiceFactory factory = new ConfigurableServiceFactory(opt);
> Factories.setDefaultServiceFactory(factory);
>
> The rest of the code can remain unchanged. Another option is to specify
> the factory when you create the SessionClient object:
>
> SessionClient session = new SessionClient(url, null, null, factory);
>
> I have not seen any differences between having the HTTPConstants.CHUNKED
> parameter true or false, so it would really be nice if you can verify
> that the configurable factory is working.
>
Thank you for including the changes into 2.8. I tested both ways of
using custom ServiceFactory and both work. I like more the first way,
though.
Thanks once again and all the best,
Pawel
> /Nicklas
>
>
>> Pawel
>>
>> Nicklas Nordborg wrote:
>>> Thanks for the code. It was something like this that I had in mind. The
>>> one thing I don't like is to pass the type as an 'int' parameter in the
>>> constructor and having a switch statement that creates the actual object
>>> to use. This makes it impossible for others to use their own
>>> implementations of 'RPCServiceClientCreator'. Wouldn't it be better to
>>> pass a 'RPCServiceClientCreator' directly to the constructor?
>>>
>>> Eg.
>>>
>>> protected AbstractRPCClient(
>>> String url, String service,
>>> RPCServiceClientCreator serviceCreator)
>>> {
>>> ...
>>> }
>>>
>>> /Nicklas
>>>
>>> Pawel Sztromwasser wrote:
>>>> Hi Nicklas,
>>>>
>>>> I had some time and implemented the 'ServiceFactory' functionality.
>>>> Gzipped java files are attached. To summarize changes:
>>>>
>>>> 1) three new classes/interfaces were created (I put them in
>>>> net.sf.basedb.ws.client.added package):
>>>> a) RPCServiceClientCreator - interface containing RPCServiceClient
>>>> getService(String serviceUrl) method for creating RPCServiceClient objects
>>>> b) DefaultRPCServiceClientCreator - factory class implementing
>>>> interface above. It creates RPCServiceClient objects in the way they
>>>> were created in AbstractRPCClient.getService() method.
>>>> c) NoChunkRPCServiceClientCreator - the same as above but with CHUNK
>>>> option set to false.
>>>>
>>>> 2) AbstractRPCClient class uses own RPCServiceClientCreator object to
>>>> create objects in getService() method. Creator object is initialized in
>>>> constructor (type of creator is an argument of additional constructor).
>>>> The creator type can be chosen between values supported by
>>>> AbstractRPCClient, available as public static constants (currently only
>>>> DEFAULT_RPC_SERVICE_CLIENT and NO_CHUNK_RPC_SERVICE_CLIENT). If no
>>>> creator type is supplied, default one is used.
>>>>
>>>> 3) all the subclasses of AbstractRPCClient have additional constructor
>>>> with last argument being type of RPCServiceClientCreator which refers to
>>>> constructor in superclass. This makes possible to choose creator type
>>>> when programming BASE2 webservices clients.
>>>>
>>>> I attached diffs.txt file which contains diff output on
>>>> net/sf/basedb/ws/client/ folders for my version and 2.7.1. Just thought,
>>>> it might be helpful.
>>>>
>>>> I hope the code will be useful.
>>>>
>>>> Best wishes,
>>>> Pawel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nicklas Nordborg wrote:
>>>>> Pawel Sztromwasser wrote:
>>>>>> Hello BASE developers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have been recently trying to enable retrieving some data from
>>>>>> BASE2 installation directly into our 'home made' analysis tool. We
>>>>>> use webservices for that and have to say that you are doing a great
>>>>>> job.
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>> We are really looking forward to use them more extensively.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Recently, when I started testing the tool not only within the local
>>>>>> network I noticed that the webservice client does not switch off
>>>>>> chunking. It results in attached exception cascade. Chunking is on by
>>>>>> default in axis2 and some servers (i.e. our gateway to BASE which
>>>>>> apparently uses HTTP1.0 and not 1.1) have problems with it. The
>>>>>> remedy is to use
>>>>>>
>>>>>> options.setProperty(HTTPConstants.CHUNKED, false);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> in net.sf.basedb.ws.client.AbstractRPCClient.getService(). I don't
>>>>>> know what are the drawbacks of it, but that was the only way I could
>>>>>> run the services in our current setup (BASE2.6 accessible by
>>>>>> proxypass from exposed webserver). Could this option be set off by
>>>>>> default or configurable somewhere? Or maybe there is some other
>>>>>> workaround?
>>>>> I am afraid that I am not very familiar with all possible options that
>>>>> is available in the Axis API:s. There seems to be a lot of them and
>>>>> their Javadoc is not very informative about what many of the options
>>>>> are used for. The CHUNKED option seems to be related to the way HTTP
>>>>> requests are made, but I have to admit that this is the first time I
>>>>> have heard of it. This means that I probably know even less than you
>>>>> about this.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that, in the future, there may be more requests about being
>>>>> able to set other options. So, it may be better to think ahead and try
>>>>> to figure out some way to be able to do this as easy as possible. With
>>>>> the current BASE API the only workaround that doesn't involve changing
>>>>> the BASE code is to subclass all AbstractRPCClient subclasses and
>>>>> override the 'getService()' method. This is not very elegent since
>>>>> there are several such classes and the new 'getService()' will be
>>>>> added to each one of them.
>>>>>
>>>>> A better approach may be to create a 'ServiceFactory' interface which
>>>>> has a 'createService()' method. The default implementation would then
>>>>> work as the AbstractRPCClient.getService() does today. The last step
>>>>> is to figure out a way to switch to another 'ServiceFactory'
>>>>> implementation either by having a configuration file or by being able
>>>>> to specify it programmatically.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have opened a ticket for this issue
>>>>> http://base.thep.lu.se/ticket/1057. It falls under the 'contributions
>>>>> welcome' category since right now we are forced to prioritize other
>>>>> things.
>>>>>
>>>>> /Nicklas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
>>>>> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
>>>>> just about anything Open Source.
>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> basedb-devel mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/basedb-devel
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
>>>> challenge
>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
>>>> prizes
>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> basedb-devel mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/basedb-devel
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
>>> prizes
>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> basedb-devel mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/basedb-devel
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
>> _______________________________________________
>> basedb-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/basedb-devel
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> basedb-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/basedb-devel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
basedb-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/basedb-devel
