On 2012-05-15, Christian Grün <[email protected]> wrote:

>> I just noticed that BaseX doesn't support the Full Text ignore option
>> ("without content").  Are there any plans to add support for it?
>
> currently, no (this may change if we find enough people willing to
> sponsor this feature).

Thanks for the quick reply.  I've added this information to the
documentation to make it easier to find.  If you need it, it's a real
show-stopper: Text containing footnotes or other embedded annotation
(typical for TEI documents) is effectively not searchable.

I'll thus probably have to abandon BaseX, which is a real pity, because
otherwise it's really great.

What's worse, the competition also has many drawbacks: MXQuery is not a
complete database and seems to be unmaintained; Qizx claims to support
the ignore option, but it otherwise doesn't look really convincing to
me; Sedna doesn't support Full Text at all; eXist's Lucene-based full
text index seems to have the features I need, but it uses proprietary
XQuery extensions for full-text search, not the Full Text
Recommendation.

Best regards

-- 
Dr.-Ing. Michael Piotrowski, M.A. <[email protected]>
Institute of Computational Linguistics, University of Zurich
Phone +41 44 63-54313 | OpenPGP public key ID 0x1614A044
* OUT NOW: Systems and Frameworks for Computational Morphology
*          <http://www.springeronline.com/978-3-642-23137-7>
_______________________________________________
BaseX-Talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk

Reply via email to