>From my reading: it looks like the latest version of the spec has addressed the "updating operations in closures" issue. Can we expect a BaseX implementation soon :-)
/Andy On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Christian Grün <christian.gr...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > > Doesn't it introduce performance problems though? If you do this copying > with some bigger chunk of XML does it take the same amount of memory or is > it somehow "delta" optimized? > > Yes; this is due to the specification, btw. Whatever you copy in your > XQUF spec. is supposed to be cached before it is being evaluated. > > Regarding updating operations in closures: the current version of the > spec. disallows updating operations, because it cannot be statically > determined if a dynamic function invocation is an updating expression > or not. See [1] for more details. > > Best, > Christian > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-update-30/#id-dynamic-function-invocation > _______________________________________________ > BaseX-Talk mailing list > BaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de > https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk >
_______________________________________________ BaseX-Talk mailing list BaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk
