Hi Yannis,

yes, I see that the required xmlns:xlink declaration is missing in the
resulting document. We will have a look at that!

Thanks,
Christian


On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Ioannis Kavvouras
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Christinan,
>
> Thank you for the quick reply. We changed the baseXDB with the new release
> but we also had the same problem.
>
> Regards
> Yannis
>
>
>
> On 01/28/2014 12:42 PM, Christian Grün wrote:
>>
>> Yannis,
>>
>> thanks for your report and the examples. One question ahead: does the
>> problem also occur with the latest snapshot [1]? The next official
>> release will be aligned with the XMLPrague conference [2].
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Christian
>>
>> [1] http://files.basex.org/releases/latest/
>> [2] http://xmlprague.cz/
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Ioannis Kavvouras
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> While trying to execute a replace query [1], we face the following
>>> problem:
>>> The new "capabilities" node contains a group of subnodes which have in
>>> their
>>> definition the same namespace definition (xmlns namespace). The problem
>>> is
>>> that in the result after the replacement the namespace definition is only
>>> in
>>> the first node (ows:ServiceIdentification). In the following nodes the
>>> majority of the attributes in the namespace definition are missing and as
>>> a
>>> consequence the xml file is corrupted as the definition of the elements
>>> are
>>> undefined. An example of a corrupted node where the attributes of the
>>> namespace definition are missing is mentioned at [2].
>>>
>>> [1] https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/78985205/query.txt
>>> [2] https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/78985205/result.txt
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Yannis
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> BaseX-Talk mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk
>
>
_______________________________________________
BaseX-Talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk

Reply via email to