> Only I think that to avoid confusion with "resource" > elements returned by db:list-details(), maybe it's better to call it > "properties".
Makes sense. > I would also think that it's worth mirroring the original system > "properties" returned by db:list-details. I thought about this, too. Let's see. > Okay, so from this signature I understand that you're not planning on > returning different property value types. Is that right? Yes. As it's not straightforward how to represent different types with BaseX commands, and as string values can easily be converted to booleans, numbers and dates, I prefer to start with a simple approach, which may be extended in future. Thanks for your feedback, Christian
