38 minutes between the email with the links, and a new build being publicly released on the website. BaseX and Saxon are the 2 most incredibly reactive companies to solve stuff! (and BaseX always makes them available on a public snapshot!)
-- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/ http://h2oconsulting.be/ On 12 May 2015 at 10:46, Christian Grün wrote: >> Not between 2 versions not next to each other (20120509 and >> 20100107). But it happens that the change occurred between the latest >> (20120509) and the directly previous one (20101111). > > Fine! > > I have updated the snapshot [1]; both 'content' and the abbrev > directory will now be detected. > Christian > > [1] http://files.basex.org/releases/latest/ > > >> So you can >> follow the link "Revision markup", which is the diff version from an >> edition against the previous one: >> http://expath.org/spec/pkg/20120509/diff. >> >> Basically, in addition to the change with the content dir Andy >> reported, there are the following changes in that edition: >> >> - new DTD and resource components >> - dependency to a specific processor uses a URI >> - new section on URI resolution >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Florent Georges >> http://fgeorges.org/ >> http://h2oconsulting.be/ >> >> >> On 12 May 2015 at 09:52, Christian Grün wrote: >>> Hi Florent, >>> >>> Thanks for your comment. Do you plan to publish a diff version of the two >>> specs? >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Florent Georges <fgeor...@fgeorges.org> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> That's correct Andy, that has changed some time ago, based on some >>>> feedback. >>>> >>>> For what it's worth, in the implementation for Saxon and Calabash, I >>>> support both for a transitional period (if 'content' is there, that's >>>> the new model, if a dir with the package name exists, then that's the >>>> old format and I issue a warning but keep going, else it is a format >>>> error). >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Florent Georges >>>> http://fgeorges.org/ >>>> http://h2oconsulting.be/ >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12 May 2015 at 09:30, Christian Grün wrote: >>>>> Hi Andy, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the hint. I will browse through the current and the older >>>>> version of the spec in order to find out what else has changed. >>>>> >>>>> Christian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Andy Bunce <bunce.a...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> It appears the EXPath package format has changed. The current version of >>>>>> the >>>>>> spec reads: >>>>>> >>>>>> the root of the ZIP file contains a directory named content, containing >>>>>> the >>>>>> components and any other file the package needs. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://expath.org/spec/pkg#descriptor >>>>>> >>>>>> A previous version http://expath.org/spec/pkg/20100107#d2e112 reads >>>>>> >>>>>> Alongside this descriptor, the root of the ZIP file contains a directory >>>>>> named after the module name (see below) which contains the components and >>>>>> any other file the package needs. >>>>>> >>>>>> BaseX appears only to support this earlier version. If a package using a >>>>>> content folder is installed the following error is reported: >>>>>> >>>>>> [bxerr:BXRE0004] Package descriptor: Invalid attribute 'name' >>>>>> >>>>>> /Andy
