I remember that people have asked in the past if we couldn’t update our web.xml information (because they were using newer features such as HTTP/2 along with BaseX). I guess that vanilla distributions of BaseX should still be compatible with 3.1.
Looking forward to the WebSphere response, Christian On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 7:14 PM, Stefania Axo <[email protected]> wrote: > what i was wondering if there was something that in BaseX 90 is depending on > 4.0 level of servlet in general. > In other words if it is safe to run BaseX 0 with an older level of servlet > like 3.1, for example. > > i did contact the WebSphere developer to see when it would be available. I > am waiting for an answer. > > thanks > Stefania > > > > From: "Christian Grün" <[email protected]> > To: Stefania Axo <[email protected]> > Cc: BaseX <[email protected]> > Date: 03/31/2018 10:48 AM > Subject: Re: [basex-talk] web.xml changed in BaseX 90 to servlet 4.0 > ________________________________ > > > > Hi Stefania, > >> I set on the BaseX 90 web.xml the old version of the servlet and that >> seemed >> to work. I am not sure if i will encounter other problems though. >> is the setting necessary in basex 9.0? or am i ok to downgraded for BaseX >> 90 > > I have no experience with WebSphere Liberty, so you may need to try if > everything works as expected. > > As Servlet 4.0 is used a lot in practice nowadays: Did you already try > to contact the WebSphere developer team in order to find out when > version 4 will be supported? > > Best, > Christian > > > >
