reassign 128997 bash
thanks

On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:08:02 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> reopen 128997
> thanks
> 
> Please read http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-refcard which contains an 
> explanation why to not use "close".

I already know how to use cont...@.
Yet I could have added a #comment there, but the close was completely wrong (it
should've been a reassign rather). Sorry.

> Looking at the bug, your actions (tags -wontfix, tags +wontfix, close) 
> also don't give me any clue why you suddenly changed your opinion 
> from "why shouldn't we fix this?" and closed my bug.

As stated above, I missed a reassign in the mail to cont...@.
This is a bug in the bash package, not bash-completion (and I don't why Luk
reassigned it in first instance).

Both /etc/bash.bashrc and /etc/skel/.bashrc belong to the bash package, so it
should be fixed there.

The "+ wontfix" is because Matthias Klose originally tagged it this way, so I'm
leaving decision up to him now.


Bye,
David

-- 
 . ''`.  Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Bash-completion-devel mailing list
Bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/bash-completion-devel

Reply via email to