Le 09/01/2010 12:21, Ville Skyttä a écrit : > On Saturday 09 January 2010, Ville Skyttä wrote: >> The following commit has been merged in the master branch: >> commit 66f5c11ab7894125039fc366c80d651f06587c43 >> Author: Ville Skyttä <ville.sky...@iki.fi> >> Date: Sat Jan 9 11:44:36 2010 +0200 >> >> (testsuite) Add simple rpm completion tests. > [...] >> +set _old_match_max [match_max] >> +match_max 100000 > [...] >> +match_max $_old_match_max > > Expect's default buffer size is too small - 2000 bytes according to the man > page here - for cases where we have a lot of completions. In addition to > rpm, > there are at least pkg_info, portupgrade, portinstall, and probably quite a > few other tests that have this problem. > > Opinions, should we fiddle with match_max where needed (like > lib/completions/rpm.exp above), or should we just bump it to a large value > (100000?) for all tests? I'm leaning towards the latter. I guess it's because you have a large rpm db, right ? Should we not try to provide a constant test environement, instead of relying of tester one ? It may be difficult in some case (such as creating a fake rpm db here), but others (such as host completion relying on content of HOSTFILE) should be more easy to mock.
-- BOFH excuse #129: The ring needs another token _______________________________________________ Bash-completion-devel mailing list Bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/bash-completion-devel
