>>>>> "KL" == Keiron Liddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KL> On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 13:40, Thomas E Deweese wrote:
>> What is the current state of FOP + Batik?
KL> The issue with FOP is really about the releases, not so much cvs.
KL> Currently releases are coming from a branch. There is a release
KL> happening soon that will work with 1.5b2 and current Batik cvs.
OK, cool!
KL> You don't really need to worry about it breaking functionality so
KL> much. It is really about compatibility as far as running. This
KL> 'feature' in the FOP releases is really a use at own risk at the
KL> moment.
Alright, good to know.
>> As for sooner, I don't think it would make it for 1.5B3 but
>> probably shortly there after.
KL> After would probably work better from my point of view and don't
KL> bother duplicating methods if it would be ugly.
Ok. Can you file a bug report, with me as responsible? (That way
you will get notified when it is fixed).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
