Hi Glen,
When I was in the WG (which was around a year and a half ago) the plan was to merge with the 1.1 specification. The issue was that the 1.1 spec was done in hand edited HTML which (unless you want to continue down that road) makes it very difficult to update (broken links etc).
Also as SVG 1.1 is a > 700pg document there was a feeling that as far as review was concerned it was easier to publish just the changes, otherwise people would have to "wade through" the old stuff.
Glen Mazza wrote:
BTW, Thomas, the SVG 1.2 specification states at the
top [1], "This document lists the changes from SVG
1.1. It is not a complete language description." So
apparently, in order to implement SVG 1.2, you need to
read and implement both the 1.1 and 1.2 specs. (XSL
is different, because the 1.1 XSL spec incorporates
the 1.0 spec.)
Do you know if the SVG WG is planning on merging the 1.1 and 1.2 specs into 1.2? It seems strange to keep a spec in two versions. But I'm probably missing something here.
Thanks, Glen
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG12/
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
1) Fixed bug in PackBits TIFF files with multiple
IFD's
2) Lots of small changes to support moving SVG 1.2
features into
the SVG namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
